Talk:Reagan Doctrine: Difference between revisions
imported>Denis Cavanagh No edit summary |
imported>Hayford Peirce (→Nuclear war in 1983?: what?!) |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{subpages}} | ||
}} | |||
This article, since it will be in American English (as it concerns an American topic), should be copyedited accordingly. | This article, since it will be in American English (as it concerns an American topic), should be copyedited accordingly. | ||
| Line 16: | Line 6: | ||
Cut and change as you see fit. [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 13:04, 6 December 2007 (CST) | Cut and change as you see fit. [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 13:04, 6 December 2007 (CST) | ||
== Title == | |||
Shouldn't it be moved to [[Reagan Doctrine]]? [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 10:52, 17 February 2008 (CST) | |||
Ro Thorpe did it. Good call. [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 12:14, 17 February 2008 (CST) | |||
:Thanks - [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 12:29, 17 February 2008 (CST) | |||
==Citations== | |||
I'm not going to pull a wikipedia and put fact tags everywhere, but I think we need more citations in the article. [[User:Jonathan Beshears|Jonathan Beshears]] 13:46, 17 February 2008 (CST) | |||
:I generally try and put citations in the articles I write for things like statistics, less well known information etc. Most of the info here is widely known, we wouldn't need citations to say something like 'He stepped up the gear in the Cold War' when that is broadly known... [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 16:54, 17 February 2008 (CST) | |||
===Nuclear war in 1983?=== | |||
This is the first time I've looked at this article, but statements (I removed this one) such as "By November 1983, the Soviets were close to mounting a nuclear strike, bringing global war closer than any time since the [[Cuban Missile Crisis]] of 1962." certainly need citations; this is not the only mention of imminent nuclear war. It's not something I consider generally accepted. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 20:41, 15 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Geez, who put *that* in?! First I've heard of it!!!![[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 20:46, 15 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:46, 15 May 2009
This article, since it will be in American English (as it concerns an American topic), should be copyedited accordingly.
I also spot some neutrality issues, which I leave to the reader to find... --Larry Sanger 12:49, 6 December 2007 (CST)
Cut and change as you see fit. Denis Cavanagh 13:04, 6 December 2007 (CST)
Title
Shouldn't it be moved to Reagan Doctrine? Hayford Peirce 10:52, 17 February 2008 (CST)
Ro Thorpe did it. Good call. Denis Cavanagh 12:14, 17 February 2008 (CST)
- Thanks - Ro Thorpe 12:29, 17 February 2008 (CST)
Citations
I'm not going to pull a wikipedia and put fact tags everywhere, but I think we need more citations in the article. Jonathan Beshears 13:46, 17 February 2008 (CST)
- I generally try and put citations in the articles I write for things like statistics, less well known information etc. Most of the info here is widely known, we wouldn't need citations to say something like 'He stepped up the gear in the Cold War' when that is broadly known... Denis Cavanagh 16:54, 17 February 2008 (CST)
Nuclear war in 1983?
This is the first time I've looked at this article, but statements (I removed this one) such as "By November 1983, the Soviets were close to mounting a nuclear strike, bringing global war closer than any time since the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962." certainly need citations; this is not the only mention of imminent nuclear war. It's not something I consider generally accepted. Howard C. Berkowitz 20:41, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- Geez, who put *that* in?! First I've heard of it!!!!Hayford Peirce 20:46, 15 May 2009 (UTC)