Mohs' scale: Difference between revisions
imported>Robert W King No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The '''Mohs' scale of hardness''' was described in 1822 by [[Frederick Mohs]], an Austrian [[minerologist]], who developed the scale based on scratch tests performed by miners. It is unknown who originally came up with the technique, but it is attributed to Mohs since he first published it. | The '''Mohs' scale of hardness''' was described in 1822 by [[Frederick Mohs]], an Austrian [[minerologist]], who developed the scale based on scratch tests performed by miners. It is unknown who originally came up with the technique, but it is attributed to Mohs since he first published it. | ||
The scale determines the hardness of minerals based on their | The scale determines the hardness of minerals based on their resistance to abrasion--it tests how easily one material might scratch another, and in particular the resistance between minerals. Some minerals may be able to scratch others more easily than the reverse case. | ||
Unfortunately, while Mohs based his scale off of ten of the most readily found minerals of his time, the scale is not even. | Unfortunately, while Mohs based his scale off of ten of the most readily found minerals of his time, the scale is not even. | ||
{|align="left" cellpadding="5" style="background-color:lightyellow; width: | {|align="left" cellpadding="5" style="background-color:lightyellow; width:30%; border: 1px solid #aaa; margin:10px; font-size: 90%;" | ||
|<big>'''Mohs' scale:'''</big> | |<big>'''Mohs' scale:'''</big> | ||
*10 [[Diamond]] | *10 [[Diamond]] | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Diamond, for example, is extremely harder than corundum; flourite is not much harder than calcite. However, there are many other minerals that fit within the scale that can provide a better analysis of what the change in hardness actually "means". | Diamond, for example, is extremely harder than corundum; flourite is not much harder than calcite. However, there are many other minerals that fit within the scale that can provide a better analysis of what the change in hardness actually "means". | ||
The Mohs' scale is by no means a scientific analysis of hardness--it does not account for environment variables like weathering, or deterioration. Mostly it is meant to provide a rough estimate of hardness. Since the initial conception of Mohs's scale, other scales have been developed to place greater meaning and implied value of the hardness levels. | The Mohs' scale is by no means a scientific analysis of hardness--it does not account for environment variables like weathering, or deterioration. Mostly it is meant to provide a rough estimate of hardness. Since the initial conception of Mohs's scale, other scales have been developed to place greater meaning and implied value of the hardness levels.[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:01, 20 September 2024
The Mohs' scale of hardness was described in 1822 by Frederick Mohs, an Austrian minerologist, who developed the scale based on scratch tests performed by miners. It is unknown who originally came up with the technique, but it is attributed to Mohs since he first published it.
The scale determines the hardness of minerals based on their resistance to abrasion--it tests how easily one material might scratch another, and in particular the resistance between minerals. Some minerals may be able to scratch others more easily than the reverse case.
Unfortunately, while Mohs based his scale off of ten of the most readily found minerals of his time, the scale is not even.
| Mohs' scale: |
Diamond, for example, is extremely harder than corundum; flourite is not much harder than calcite. However, there are many other minerals that fit within the scale that can provide a better analysis of what the change in hardness actually "means".
The Mohs' scale is by no means a scientific analysis of hardness--it does not account for environment variables like weathering, or deterioration. Mostly it is meant to provide a rough estimate of hardness. Since the initial conception of Mohs's scale, other scales have been developed to place greater meaning and implied value of the hardness levels.