Talk:Recession of 2009: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner (New page: {{subpages}}) |
imported>Nick Gardner (→Bibliography and references: new section) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
== A New York Times article: [http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/magazine/06Economic-t.html How Did Economists Get It So Wrong?] == | |||
May be relevant here or on related articles. --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 08:37, 11 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Bibliography and references == | |||
It is possible that reputable books concerning the events of 2009 may become available in 2010 or 2011. Until then, readers will have to be content with a comprehensive set of references. I hope to tackle the "how did they get it wrong" question in other articles but I believe this article should be confined to the events and policies of the recession of 2009. [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 20:36, 6 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:36, 6 October 2009
A New York Times article: How Did Economists Get It So Wrong?
May be relevant here or on related articles. --Daniel Mietchen 08:37, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Bibliography and references
It is possible that reputable books concerning the events of 2009 may become available in 2010 or 2011. Until then, readers will have to be content with a comprehensive set of references. I hope to tackle the "how did they get it wrong" question in other articles but I believe this article should be confined to the events and policies of the recession of 2009. Nick Gardner 20:36, 6 October 2009 (UTC)