User talk:Neil Brick/Sandbox/Hell Minus One/Bibliography: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Neil Brick (one view in the news) |
imported>Hayford Peirce m (Talk:Hell Minus One/Bibliography moved to User talk:Neil Brick/Sandbox/Hell Minus One/Bibliography: Psychology Editor suggested move to remove article from mainspace) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
These were external links, not bibliography, and presenting only one view. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 00:33, 9 April 2009 (UTC) | These were external links, not bibliography, and presenting only one view. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 00:33, 9 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
:At this point, there is only one published view in the news to her specific story. As more become available, they can be added.[[User:Neil Brick|Neil Brick]] 03:20, 9 April 2009 (UTC) | :At this point, there is only one published view in the news to her specific story. As more become available, they can be added.[[User:Neil Brick|Neil Brick]] 03:20, 9 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
::I am not being sarcastic when I say that the lack of news coverage is one more reason why this book is, at best, worthy of being a bibliographic note. Maintainability and notability are subtle issues, but if no one takes notice of the work, how is the article to be improved? [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 03:56, 9 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:43, 28 April 2009
The {{subpages}} template is designed to be used within article clusters and their related pages.
It will not function on User talk pages.
These were external links, not bibliography, and presenting only one view. Howard C. Berkowitz 00:33, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- At this point, there is only one published view in the news to her specific story. As more become available, they can be added.Neil Brick 03:20, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- I am not being sarcastic when I say that the lack of news coverage is one more reason why this book is, at best, worthy of being a bibliographic note. Maintainability and notability are subtle issues, but if no one takes notice of the work, how is the article to be improved? Howard C. Berkowitz 03:56, 9 April 2009 (UTC)