User talk:James Branum/Daniel Sandate: Difference between revisions
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (→Moving from WP...: new section) |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz m (Talk:Daniel Sandate moved to User talk:James Branum/Daniel Sandate) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Could you put in some detail about the nature of his Army service, medical testimony, Army allegations, and the court-martial record? Right now, it essentially states the defense position alone. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 03:56, 14 November 2009 (UTC) | Could you put in some detail about the nature of his Army service, medical testimony, Army allegations, and the court-martial record? Right now, it essentially states the defense position alone. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 03:56, 14 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
==Needs to be balanced or moved== | |||
As a Military Workgroup Editor, I determine that this article, in its present form, does not meet [[CZ: Neutrality Policy]] because it does not present the position of the U.S. military in the case. Unless this is corrected, I will move it to the author's userspace. I have asked for such modifications here, over two weeks ago, and in email. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 22:12, 27 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:12, 2 December 2009
The {{subpages}} template is designed to be used within article clusters and their related pages.
It will not function on User talk pages.
Moving from WP...
We don't use "see also" or categories, but "Related articles".
Could you put in some detail about the nature of his Army service, medical testimony, Army allegations, and the court-martial record? Right now, it essentially states the defense position alone. Howard C. Berkowitz 03:56, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Needs to be balanced or moved
As a Military Workgroup Editor, I determine that this article, in its present form, does not meet CZ: Neutrality Policy because it does not present the position of the U.S. military in the case. Unless this is corrected, I will move it to the author's userspace. I have asked for such modifications here, over two weeks ago, and in email. Howard C. Berkowitz 22:12, 27 November 2009 (UTC)