Martlet: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Alexander Liptak
No edit summary
imported>Meg Taylor
No edit summary
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Image|Alexander Liptak—Martlet—2012.png|right|thumb|The marlet, in English heraldic tradition, is a bird often depicted similar to that of a sparrow or house martin, though missing his legs.}}  
{{subpages}}
{{Image|Alexander Liptak—Martlet—2012.png|right|thumb|The marlet, in English heraldic tradition, is a bird depicted quite similar to a sparrow or house martin, though missing legs and feet. The bird is used by English heralds as a cadency mark for a fourth son.}}  


The '''martlet''', alternately spelled '''''merlette''''' in French sources, is an imagined bird found primarily in English, French and German [[heraldry]]; English custom depicts a bird similar to a [[sparrow]] or [[house martin]] without feet, the French custom renders the ''merlette'' as a duckling without feet or bill and German tradition treats the bird similiar to a [[lark]].
The '''martlet''', alternately spelled '''''merlette''''' in French sources, is an imagined bird found primarily in English, French and German [[heraldry]]; English custom depicts a bird similar to a [[sparrow]] or [[house martin]] without feet, the French custom renders the ''merlette'' as a duckling without feet or bill and German tradition treats the bird similar to a [[lark]].


The earliest known depiction of a ''merlette'' comes to us c. 1185 in the [[heraldry|coat of arms]] of the Mello family of Normandy, and soon after in the arms of families such as Merlot and Merloz. It is thought that from this use that the bird was employed as a cant on the family surnames, and thus originally intended to depict a blackbird, known as ''merle'' in the French language. However, from the 14th century onwards the ''mertlette'' appears to be used as a generic term for a small bird, appearing in the canting arms of families such as Oisery, Oisy, Loiseau, and no longer is representative of any specific species. During this period, the depcictions vary between the footed and footless ''merlette''; by the late 15th cetury the begins looses his beak in emblazonings.
The earliest known depiction of a ''merlette'' comes to us c. 1185 in the coat of arms of the Mello family of Normandy, and soon after in the canting arms of families such as Merlot and Merloz. This gives weight to the notion that the heraldic bird originally intended to depict a blackbird, known as ''merle'' in the French language. However, from the 14th century onwards the term ''merlette'' appears to be employed as a generic term for any small bird, appearing in the canting arms of families such as Oisery, Oisy and Loiseau, and is no longer representative of any specific species of bird. During this period, the depictions vary between the footed and footless ''merlette''; from the late 15th century onward the bird is more frequently depicted without a beak in emblazonings. Also in the 15th century, confusion between the ''merlette'' and the ''canette'', or duckling, seemingly arises, giving the ''merlette'' the appearance of a duckling without bill or feet.
 
Coincidentally, the French ''merlette'' was confused with the martlet in England, the common folk name for a [[swift]] at the time. The earliest examples of the martlet in English heraldry show the bird to be footed, but by the end of the 13th century the footless depictions become more frequent, and the bird is even found without a beak in some examples. This custom may have arisen, as one theory suggests, from the folk belief that the swift was legless, or, that the legs of the swift were too tiny for the bird to walk on them; the Latin name for the bird, ''apus'', is itself derived from an ancient Greek word meaning "without feet". Several instances of footed martlets do appear since then, as the custom had not yet been universally accepted; the martlets of John de Bassingbourne are without legs, those of Furnival are with legs, Robert Muschet depicts sparrow-hawks without feet in his arms and a 13th century panel in Westminster of Edward the Confessor's arms show the martlets as doves with feet. Another theory suggests that the footless martlets were devised out of a pragmatic need to free up the sometimes limited space on the ''escutcheon'', especially in the instances of the orle of martlets that decorated the border of a shield with several of the birds, and that this practical approach eventually became the norm over time.

Latest revision as of 02:10, 30 August 2013

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.
The marlet, in English heraldic tradition, is a bird depicted quite similar to a sparrow or house martin, though missing legs and feet. The bird is used by English heralds as a cadency mark for a fourth son.

The martlet, alternately spelled merlette in French sources, is an imagined bird found primarily in English, French and German heraldry; English custom depicts a bird similar to a sparrow or house martin without feet, the French custom renders the merlette as a duckling without feet or bill and German tradition treats the bird similar to a lark.

The earliest known depiction of a merlette comes to us c. 1185 in the coat of arms of the Mello family of Normandy, and soon after in the canting arms of families such as Merlot and Merloz. This gives weight to the notion that the heraldic bird originally intended to depict a blackbird, known as merle in the French language. However, from the 14th century onwards the term merlette appears to be employed as a generic term for any small bird, appearing in the canting arms of families such as Oisery, Oisy and Loiseau, and is no longer representative of any specific species of bird. During this period, the depictions vary between the footed and footless merlette; from the late 15th century onward the bird is more frequently depicted without a beak in emblazonings. Also in the 15th century, confusion between the merlette and the canette, or duckling, seemingly arises, giving the merlette the appearance of a duckling without bill or feet.

Coincidentally, the French merlette was confused with the martlet in England, the common folk name for a swift at the time. The earliest examples of the martlet in English heraldry show the bird to be footed, but by the end of the 13th century the footless depictions become more frequent, and the bird is even found without a beak in some examples. This custom may have arisen, as one theory suggests, from the folk belief that the swift was legless, or, that the legs of the swift were too tiny for the bird to walk on them; the Latin name for the bird, apus, is itself derived from an ancient Greek word meaning "without feet". Several instances of footed martlets do appear since then, as the custom had not yet been universally accepted; the martlets of John de Bassingbourne are without legs, those of Furnival are with legs, Robert Muschet depicts sparrow-hawks without feet in his arms and a 13th century panel in Westminster of Edward the Confessor's arms show the martlets as doves with feet. Another theory suggests that the footless martlets were devised out of a pragmatic need to free up the sometimes limited space on the escutcheon, especially in the instances of the orle of martlets that decorated the border of a shield with several of the birds, and that this practical approach eventually became the norm over time.