CZ:Economics Workgroup: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner
No edit summary
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards
Line 11: Line 11:
'''Core economics articles which are completely MISSING'''
'''Core economics articles which are completely MISSING'''


[[International economics]]
*[[International economics]]
 
*[[Welfare economics]]
[[Welfare economics]]
*[[Comparative advantage]]
 
*[[Economy of scale]]
[[Comparative advantage]]
*[[Balance of payments]]
 
*[[Terms of trade]]
[[Economy of scale]]
*[[Externalities]]
 
*[[Elasticity]]
[[Balance of payments]]
*[[Markets]]
 
*[[Supply]]
[[Terms of trade]]
*[[Demand]]
 
*[[GNP or GDP]]
[[Externalities]]
*[[Central Bank]]
 
*[[money supply]]
[[Elasticity]]
 
[[Markets]]
 
[[Supply]]
 
[[Demand]]
 
[[GNP or GDP]]
 
 
'''Core economics articles which are stubs or low quality'''
'''Core economics articles which are stubs or low quality'''


[[Factors of production]]
*[[Factors of production]]
 
*[[GDP deflator]]
[[GDP deflator]]
*[[Gross domestic product]]
 
[[Gross domestic product]]


'''Core economics articles which are good but need development to reach approval standard'''
'''Core economics articles which are good but need development to reach approval standard'''


[[Economics]]
*[[Economics]]
 
*[[Microeconomics]]
[[Microeconomics]]
*[[Macroeconomics]]
 
[[Macroeconomics]]
 


'''Economics articles which seem redundant but whose content may be useful for other articles'''
'''Economics articles which seem redundant but whose content may be useful for other articles'''
Line 60: Line 44:
'''Economics articles which appear to be finished, of very high quality, and may be ready for formal Editor approval'''
'''Economics articles which appear to be finished, of very high quality, and may be ready for formal Editor approval'''


[[Demographic transition]]
 





Revision as of 08:06, 11 October 2007

Workgroups are no longer used for group communications, but they still are used to group articles into fields of interest. Each article is assigned to 1-3 Workgroups via the article's Metadata.

Economics Workgroup
Economics article All articles (362) To Approve (0) Editors: active (0) / inactive (13)
and
Authors: active (172) / inactive (0)
Workgroup Discussion
Recent changes Citable Articles (12)
Subgroups (5)
Checklist-generated categories:

Subpage categories:

Missing subpage categories:

Article statuses:


A CALL TO ECONOMICS AUTHORS AND EDITORS

We need much more activity on CZ with social science, and especially economics articles. A new author here, Nick Gardner, has made a heroic start with some core Economics articles. We transferred the text from the old article Economics to a new article History of economic thought which now requires massive editing to put it in shape. There are also some other articles which need attention. I propose listing articles into several categories, to guide us through the workload.

Please add any articles you would like to nominate for these groupings [and feel free to start work on them too!]


Core economics articles which are completely MISSING

Core economics articles which are stubs or low quality

Core economics articles which are good but need development to reach approval standard

Economics articles which seem redundant but whose content may be useful for other articles

Economics subdisciplines


Economics articles which appear to be finished, of very high quality, and may be ready for formal Editor approval




Below, I also paste a message from Nick, about his recent edits on some core economics articles. We hope that we can put together a really good economics coverage on CZ.--Martin Baldwin-Edwards 20:10, 23 September 2007 (CDT)

New articles

I have made a tentative start at writing new articles on Economics, Microeconomics and Macroeconomics.

I have aimed them at the ordinary reader seeking a broad appreciation of what it's about rather than at students of economics looking for help with their essays. I leave the task of meeting students' needs to those of you that are in the teaching profession. I suggest putting that material in a separate article titled (perhaps) " Economic Theory"

Please let me have your comments and criticisms.

Nick Gardner 15:33, 23 September 2007 (CDT)

Suggestions please!

Subject to comments, I have finished with Economics and nearly finished with Macroeconomics. I should appreciate some fellow-economists' comments before I turn to other things. Is anybody interested?

Nick Gardner 07:32, 28 September 2007 (CDT)