Talk:Industrial Revolution/Draft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Jitse Niesen
m (convert to {{subpages}})
imported>Roger A. Lohmann
(Nominate for Approval)
Line 2: Line 2:


Most of the article, in its existing form, is fairly childish, mixing causes and results, important and trivial, etc. Is it worth rewriting, or should be simply dump this altogether to write it from scratch? [[User:Ori Redler|Ori Redler]] 19:26, 25 November 2006 (CST)
Most of the article, in its existing form, is fairly childish, mixing causes and results, important and trivial, etc. Is it worth rewriting, or should be simply dump this altogether to write it from scratch? [[User:Ori Redler|Ori Redler]] 19:26, 25 November 2006 (CST)
===Nominate for Approval===
::The comment above, made nearly two years ago, has not been followed up with any details or revisions, and thus deserves to be ignored. Meanwhile, there have been several hundred changes by others.
::In my view, the "See Also..." comments near the bottom belong on the Related Articles page, so I've added them there (and left them on the Main Page also until the issue can be resolved.
Other than that, I think the article may be ready to be Approved, and so I am nominating it.
::[[User:Roger Lohmann|Roger Lohmann]] 08:53, 29 June 2008 (CDT)

Revision as of 07:53, 29 June 2008

This article has a Citable Version.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  A period of major economic transformation in Britain from the 1750s to the 1830s, characterized by the growth of a new system comprising factories, railroads, coal mining and business enterprises using new technologies. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  History, Business and Economics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English

Most of the article, in its existing form, is fairly childish, mixing causes and results, important and trivial, etc. Is it worth rewriting, or should be simply dump this altogether to write it from scratch? Ori Redler 19:26, 25 November 2006 (CST)

Nominate for Approval

The comment above, made nearly two years ago, has not been followed up with any details or revisions, and thus deserves to be ignored. Meanwhile, there have been several hundred changes by others.
In my view, the "See Also..." comments near the bottom belong on the Related Articles page, so I've added them there (and left them on the Main Page also until the issue can be resolved.

Other than that, I think the article may be ready to be Approved, and so I am nominating it.

Roger Lohmann 08:53, 29 June 2008 (CDT)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Industrial_Revolution/Draft&oldid=106616"