Talk:Ancient Rome: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Robert Mack
No edit summary
imported>Robert Mack
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}


 
== Scope? ==
This is very much a work in progress right now. Clearly this is a very broad topic and I hardly know where to begin. As such I have been working on the bibliography mainly. I also think 'Ancient Rome' is very ambiguous. When I hear that I think of the city proper, however I felt that this article should cover the political entity rather then the city proper. Feedback anyone?
==Forum Romanum==
==Forum Romanum==
This article looks pretty good, though my biggest concern is the Forum Romanum section. This needs a major improvement. Any feedback? [[User:James Hare|James Hare]] 22:18, 25 November 2006 (CST)
This article looks pretty good, though my biggest concern is the Forum Romanum section. This needs a major improvement. Any feedback? [[User:James Hare|James Hare]] 22:18, 25 November 2006 (CST)

Revision as of 05:01, 20 December 2007

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Catalogs [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition The most powerful empire of the ancient world. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category History [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Scope?

This is very much a work in progress right now. Clearly this is a very broad topic and I hardly know where to begin. As such I have been working on the bibliography mainly. I also think 'Ancient Rome' is very ambiguous. When I hear that I think of the city proper, however I felt that this article should cover the political entity rather then the city proper. Feedback anyone?

Forum Romanum

This article looks pretty good, though my biggest concern is the Forum Romanum section. This needs a major improvement. Any feedback? James Hare 22:18, 25 November 2006 (CST)