Talk:Systems biology: Difference between revisions
imported>Chris day |
imported>Anthony.Sebastian |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:I am fine with such a compromise, especially if you feel strongly. I would suggest that an exhaustive list is not appropriate. I suppose the original reason for those lists were the novelty factor of systems biology. Such a list would not be considered for a more mature branch of biology so we should keep that in mind too. [[User:Chris day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris day|(Talk)]] 15:36, 19 December 2006 (CST) | :I am fine with such a compromise, especially if you feel strongly. I would suggest that an exhaustive list is not appropriate. I suppose the original reason for those lists were the novelty factor of systems biology. Such a list would not be considered for a more mature branch of biology so we should keep that in mind too. [[User:Chris day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris day|(Talk)]] 15:36, 19 December 2006 (CST) | ||
::Chris, wil keep your suggestions in mind as I edit lists.[[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] [[User talk:Anthony Sebastian|(Talk)]] 13:21, 20 December 2006 (CST) | |||
== Added section: On the Nature of Biological "Systems" == | == Added section: On the Nature of Biological "Systems" == | ||
Revision as of 13:21, 20 December 2006
Beginning Edit
I plan to update/edit this article in stages as time permits. Anthony.Sebastian 14:57, 17 December 2006 (CST)
Regarding Chris Day's Removal of Externals Links
Chris, you say you're not sure we need the external links to labs and conferences in the 'Systems Biology' article. I feel strongly that they add to the quality of the article. For example, clicking on the link to the Institute for Systems Biology provides the reader with additional depth on the goals and approaches in the discipline not contained in the CZ article, examples of application, and webcasts. CZ gains that at little cost in space or distraction.
Moreover, those labs and conferences abound with experts in many fields, as systems biology operates as an interdisciplinary discipline. Whether those experts discover the CZ article linking to their sites, or we apprise them of the article (or related articles) as potentially benefitting from their expertise, CZ may have a chance of gaining their participation in the project.
I would suggest a comprise: Let's leave the links in, and I will go through each one, eliminating those sites that offer the reader little or no added-value to the main "Systems Biology' article.
Thanks for considering this.
Anthony.Sebastian 13:18, 19 December 2006 (CST)
- I am fine with such a compromise, especially if you feel strongly. I would suggest that an exhaustive list is not appropriate. I suppose the original reason for those lists were the novelty factor of systems biology. Such a list would not be considered for a more mature branch of biology so we should keep that in mind too. Chris Day (Talk) 15:36, 19 December 2006 (CST)
- Chris, wil keep your suggestions in mind as I edit lists.Anthony.Sebastian (Talk) 13:21, 20 December 2006 (CST)
Added section: On the Nature of Biological "Systems"
It seemed me to make the article on 'Systems Biology' more intelligible to the general reader to say something about what systems biologists mean when they speak of 'systems'. I tried to cover just the main points, and to exemplify them. Comments, sggestions, etc., welcomed.
Anthony.Sebastian (Talk) 14:19, 19 December 2006 (CST)