Talk:Snake (animal): Difference between revisions
imported>Nancy Sculerati MD No edit summary |
imported>India Williams (adding checklist template and filling out what I know) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{checklist | |||
| abc = Snake | |||
| cat1 = Biology | |||
| cat2 = | |||
| cat3 = | |||
| cat_check = Y | |||
| status = 2 | |||
| underlinked = | |||
| cleanup = Y | |||
| by = [[User:India Williams|India Williams]] 18:11, 10 April 2007 (CDT) | |||
}} | |||
Beginning to rewrite this article with 2 goals in mind: (1) using language that maintains the interest of the general reader and (2) fitting the subject into biological science. Please join me![[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 09:58, 29 January 2007 (CST) | Beginning to rewrite this article with 2 goals in mind: (1) using language that maintains the interest of the general reader and (2) fitting the subject into biological science. Please join me![[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 09:58, 29 January 2007 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 18:11, 10 April 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Biology Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | Not specified |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | India Williams 18:11, 10 April 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Beginning to rewrite this article with 2 goals in mind: (1) using language that maintains the interest of the general reader and (2) fitting the subject into biological science. Please join me!Nancy Sculerati MD 09:58, 29 January 2007 (CST)
Removed line about "old synonym for snakes". It's perfectly acceptable to call a snake a serpent, this is a current synonym. Nancy Sculerati MD 10:05, 29 January 2007 (CST)
Format: Derivation and use of word/triple line/Body of article
I would like to make a case for adopting this as Citizendium style. I think it has the advantage of keeping all the word origin and use stuff, but- especially if it became standard and users would learn that the actual article starts after the triple line- not muddying up the introduction with this stuff. Nancy Sculerati MD 10:09, 29 January 2007 (CST)
As I am editing this article I am finding a number of direct quotation from sources that are not placed in quotes and are not referenced. Therefore, I am deleting them as I go. No original research does not mean no original writing ;-) !!Nancy Sculerati MD 10:17, 29 January 2007 (CST)
- Biology Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Biology Advanced Articles
- Biology Nonstub Articles
- Biology Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Biology Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Biology Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Biology Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Biology External Articles
- Biology Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Biology Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup