Talk:Adventures of Huckleberry Finn: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Hillie Plantinga
(Article Checklist)
imported>Hayford Peirce
(Help needed)
Line 24: Line 24:


[[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 08:34, 19 February 2007 (CST)
[[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 08:34, 19 February 2007 (CST)
==Help needed==
Oh my! Is all I can say about the quality of this article, especially the sophomoric writing.  It was imported directly from a GNU site and the first paragraph appears to be unaltered.  This is one of those articles where it is probably easier to start all over again than to attempt to rehabilitate the tortured "prose" that currently exists. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 18:36, 10 June 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 18:36, 10 June 2007


Article Checklist for "Adventures of Huckleberry Finn"
Workgroup category or categories Literature Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Hillie Plantinga 13:49, 29 March 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





What is the purpose of placing this summary as the start of an entry on the novel?

Russell Potter 20:42, 13 February 2007 (CST)

I have to agree (and a hearty welcome back to you, Russell). An article about a novel should be far more than a summary. --Larry Sanger 10:57, 18 February 2007 (CST)

Huck, Mark, etc.

Hi Larry -- well, ok, I couldn't resist lurking!

I note that one of the red links in this article is Mark Twain himself -- whew! -- there's a tall order. But maybe one way to jump-start the Literature articles would be to send an e-mail invitation to some established authorities on Mark Twain (or any other similar major literary figure), and invite them to write the main entry article from scratch. In cases where you found a willing participant, these kinds of main entries would at least give CZ a type and quality of content that WP lacks.

Russell Potter 08:34, 19 February 2007 (CST)

Help needed

Oh my! Is all I can say about the quality of this article, especially the sophomoric writing. It was imported directly from a GNU site and the first paragraph appears to be unaltered. This is one of those articles where it is probably easier to start all over again than to attempt to rehabilitate the tortured "prose" that currently exists. Hayford Peirce 18:36, 10 June 2007 (CDT)