Talk:Leser v. Garnett

Adam, welcome to the project and thanks for importing your article here. Just, please, could you take some time in the next few days and improve this article over the Wikipedia version? I want to avoid our making CZ into a "best of Wikipedia" or anything like a mirror of Wikipedia. --Larry Sanger 11:48, 26 February 2007 (CST)

Do you have anything specific that you feel would improve this article over its current version? The article is short by necessity (the opinion itself is a very direct 4 paragraphs), and I think it covers all the important points. I'm happy to work to improve it, but it already seems basically complete to me. - Adam Vartanian 13:56, 26 February 2007 (CST)

No ideas (well, no time to offer them). It's hard to believe that you think a better job can't be done. I can always think of ways to improve what I write, and I don't think that's just because I'm a crappy writer.  :-) Then we should delete it, shouldn't we? Because, as I said, we aren't making a mirror of WP here. Please see CZ:How to convert Wikipedia articles to Citizendium articles. --Larry Sanger 17:08, 26 February 2007 (CST)

Article Checklist for "Leser v. Garnett"

Workgroup category or categories	Law Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status	Developed article: complete or nearly so
Underlinked article?	Yes
Basic cleanup done?	Yes
Checklist last edited by	David Martin 18:25, 14 May 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.

---