Talk:World War I: Difference between revisions
imported>Richard Jensen (back to wikipedia days? fooling around with articles) |
imported>Richard Jensen (weak eyesight determines policy?) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:::you know it's a real pain when someone totally ignorant of WWi moves in and overrides experienced editors. This is an unfortunate reversion to wikipedia days, I fear. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 20:53, 23 September 2007 (CDT) | :::you know it's a real pain when someone totally ignorant of WWi moves in and overrides experienced editors. This is an unfortunate reversion to wikipedia days, I fear. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 20:53, 23 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
::perhaps is just a problem of poor eyesight--what lines of text are unreadable? I can read them all. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 20:55, 23 September 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 19:55, 23 September 2007
Machine guns and similiar technology and its effect on tactics/strategies
I'm not an expert on WWI, but it seems that there should be some mention of the effect machine guns and the like had on casualty tolls more than the bit mentioned in the Trenches subsection. I read and was taught that the high number of casualties was due in part to the use of outdated tactics and strategies from before the widespread use of highly accurate guns with high rates of fire, leading to such disasters as fatal charges across no-man's-land. Perhaps somebody more knowledgeable might be able to expand upon this in the article? Andrew Chong 09:44, 5 August 2007 (CDT)
Charts
I'm sure they'd be useful, but they aren't really readable. --Larry Sanger 00:08, 9 September 2007 (CDT)
- lotsof confusion re WWI because so many things were happening at once in many different places. Chart helps sort them out. (more legibility would be good idea--needs someone to rescan 2 pages from H.G, Wells Outline of History (1922) Richard Jensen 00:57, 9 September 2007 (CDT)
Right now, the chart is more embarrassing than helpful, because it is literally unreadable. I have removed it until it is rescanned. It can be found at Image:Ww1-summary.jpg --Larry Sanger 20:31, 23 September 2007 (CDT)
Richard, it is contrary to policy to revert without first answering a person's explanation. I should think this is particularly obvious when the person you are reverting is the editor-in-chief. Do not revert me again. --Larry Sanger 20:44, 23 September 2007 (CDT)
- I can read every word on the chart and it is a very useful device to keep track of a huge number of events all over the world. If someone wants to make a more legible copy or rescan it from HG Wells, then great. That is very unlikely to happen if it gets removed. Richard Jensen 20:45, 23 September 2007 (CDT)
- you know it's a real pain when someone totally ignorant of WWi moves in and overrides experienced editors. This is an unfortunate reversion to wikipedia days, I fear. Richard Jensen 20:53, 23 September 2007 (CDT)
- perhaps is just a problem of poor eyesight--what lines of text are unreadable? I can read them all. Richard Jensen 20:55, 23 September 2007 (CDT)