CZ Talk:Food Science Workgroup: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Thomas E Kelly No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The mailing list for the Editorial Council is set up...a high priority for me is to start using it, and this can be one of our first topics. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 00:13, 31 March 2007 (CDT) | The mailing list for the Editorial Council is set up...a high priority for me is to start using it, and this can be one of our first topics. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 00:13, 31 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
I like Culinary arts and science. [[User:Thomas E Kelly|-Tom Kelly]] [[User talk:Thomas E Kelly|(Talk)]] 22:39, 31 March 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 21:39, 31 March 2007
I think Culinary Arts is needed. Food Science is just that, and concentrates on safe and nutritious food. Or it could be called Culinary Arts & Science, so it includes Food Science and Culinary Arts. But yes, we need this workgroup! Nancy Sculerati 23:57, 30 March 2007 (CDT)
The mailing list for the Editorial Council is set up...a high priority for me is to start using it, and this can be one of our first topics. --Larry Sanger 00:13, 31 March 2007 (CDT)
I like Culinary arts and science. -Tom Kelly (Talk) 22:39, 31 March 2007 (CDT)