Talk:Noun/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Russell Potter
No edit summary
imported>John Stephenson
(Article checklist)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
|                abc = Noun
|                cat1 = Linguistics
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 2
|        underlinked = n
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 02:53, 20 April 2007 (CDT)
}}
I've got nothing against simple explanations of simple things.  However, this
I've got nothing against simple explanations of simple things.  However, this



Revision as of 01:53, 20 April 2007


Article Checklist for "Noun/Archive 1"
Workgroup category or categories Linguistics Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by John Stephenson 02:53, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





I've got nothing against simple explanations of simple things. However, this

trees, cars, houses, people, etc. These are all nouns.

is false. A tree is not a word and hence not a noun. --Larry Sanger 13:41, 17 April 2007 (CDT)

I agree. This is terribly written. After a correct definition, we might see things like grammatical number, grammatical case, etc., then things on the syntactic roles of nouns within a sentence. The last time I read anything similar to a statement that a tree is a noun was when humor columnist Dave Barry ran his annual holier-than-thou condescending column explaining grammar. Among other things, after mentioning the idea that verbs can have objects, he explained that an object is a noun that weighs at least two pounds. Michael Hardy 17:16, 17 April 2007 (CDT)
Agreed. And indeed, even though "tree" (the word, thus in quotes) can function as a noun, that does not necessarily mean it always is a noun. What about "fish" or "photograph"? We really need more work here from linguists; I have had a try at fixing Pronoun and English grammar, but there's too much work for just one person! Russell Potter 11:23, 18 April 2007 (CDT)