Talk:Star Wars: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Matt Mahlmann (visual arts category?) |
imported>David Martin No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:::I think films/movies go into [[CZ:Visual_Arts_Workgroup|visual arts]], but they have little to no guidance on their workgroup page. [[User:Matt Mahlmann|Matt Mahlmann]] 17:32, 18 April 2007 (CDT) | :::I think films/movies go into [[CZ:Visual_Arts_Workgroup|visual arts]], but they have little to no guidance on their workgroup page. [[User:Matt Mahlmann|Matt Mahlmann]] 17:32, 18 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
{{checklist | |||
| abc = Star Wars | |||
| cat1 = Media | |||
| cat2 = | |||
| cat3 = | |||
| cat_check = N | |||
| status = 3 | |||
| underlinked = Y | |||
| cleanup = Y | |||
| by = [[User:David Martin|David Martin]] 19:56, 14 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
}} |
Revision as of 18:56, 14 May 2007
Before We Jump on the bandwagon
Before we jump on the "Wikipedia bandwagon" and call the attention of all the Star Wars fans, can we get some guidance on what's notable on Citizendium and what's not? I think a detailed article on Star Wars ad its impact on society is all that's necessary, with a prominent link to the "Wookiepedia" which would answer any further questions readers might have. Wikipedia's huge section on Star Wars and Star Trek is really overboard, as there is a "Star Wars" wiki (Wookiepedia) and there is a Star Trek wiki (Memory Alpha) that would cover the nitty-gritty stuff about both subjects. Eric M Gearhart
- Agreed -- but perhaps we could do something better here. There are fans of Lucas's films, and there are scholars of film studies and cultural studies who could write a thoughtful, historically contextualized entry about these films which would be far more in-depth in its own way, and would not be redundant with fan-written wikis. Russell Potter 07:30, 18 April 2007 (CDT)
- Exactly. A high-level view of the Trilogy, from film buffs that discussed e.g. how it influenced a culture and a generation, etc. would be much more encyclopedic than a "shrine to Star Wars/Star Trek." Unfortunately I'm a SciFi geek, not a film major hehe.
The more in-depth "Obi Wan's Light saber is blue" / "In 'The Search for Spock' Spock dies and then comes back to life" details can be left to movie-specific wikis in my opinion Eric M Gearhart
- Exactly. A high-level view of the Trilogy, from film buffs that discussed e.g. how it influenced a culture and a generation, etc. would be much more encyclopedic than a "shrine to Star Wars/Star Trek." Unfortunately I'm a SciFi geek, not a film major hehe.
- I think films/movies go into visual arts, but they have little to no guidance on their workgroup page. Matt Mahlmann 17:32, 18 April 2007 (CDT)
Workgroup category or categories | Media Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Stub: no more than a few sentences |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | David Martin 19:56, 14 May 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Categories:
- Media Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Media Advanced Articles
- Media Nonstub Articles
- Media Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Media Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Media Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Media Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Media External Articles
- Media Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Media Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup