Frontier Thesis: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Richard Jensen
(add books)
imported>Gareth Leng
(→‎Bibliography: subpage)
Line 13: Line 13:
Turner's thesis quickly became popular among intellectuals, as well as spokesmen for the west. It explained why the American people and American government were so different from Europeans.  It sounded an alarming note about the future, since the U.S. Census of 1890 had officially stated that the American frontier line (separating the more-settled and lighty settled zones) had broken up. The idea that the source of America's power and uniqueness was gone was a distressing concept for some intellectuals. Some talked about overseas expansion as a new frontier; others (like [[John F. Kennedy]]) called for a "new frontier" of achievement. Despite criticism, Turner's theory entered its second century "in remarkably good shape."<ref> Limerick (1995) p 697</ref>
Turner's thesis quickly became popular among intellectuals, as well as spokesmen for the west. It explained why the American people and American government were so different from Europeans.  It sounded an alarming note about the future, since the U.S. Census of 1890 had officially stated that the American frontier line (separating the more-settled and lighty settled zones) had broken up. The idea that the source of America's power and uniqueness was gone was a distressing concept for some intellectuals. Some talked about overseas expansion as a new frontier; others (like [[John F. Kennedy]]) called for a "new frontier" of achievement. Despite criticism, Turner's theory entered its second century "in remarkably good shape."<ref> Limerick (1995) p 697</ref>


==Bibliography==
 
* [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=94943599 Ray Allen Billington. ''The American Frontier'' (1958)] 35 page essay on the historiography
* Billington, Ray Allen. ''Frederick Jackson Turner: historian, scholar, teacher.'' (1973).  full-scale biography; [http://www.historyebook.org/ online at ACLS e-books]
* Billington, Ray Allen. ed,. ''The Frontier Thesis: Valid Interpretation of American History?'' (1966).  The major attacks and defenses of Turner.
* Billington, Ray Allen. ''America's Frontier Heritage'' (1984).  detailed analysis of Turner's theories from social science perspective
* Billington, Ray Allen. ''America's Frontier Heritage'' (1984), an analysis of Turner's theories in relation to social sciences and historiography
* [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=106262124 Billington, Ray Allen. ''Land of Savagery / Land of Promise: The European Image of the American Frontier in the Nineteenth Century'' (1981)]
* Bogue, Allan G.  ''Frederick Jackson Turner: Strange Roads Going Down.'' (1988) along with Billington (1973), the leading full-scale biography
* Bogue, Allan G.  "Frederick Jackson Turner Reconsidered," ''The History Teacher,'' Vol. 27, No. 2 (Feb., 1994), pp. 195-221 [http://www.jstor.org/pss/494720 in JSTOR]
* Cronon, William. "Revisiting the Vanishing Frontier: The Legacy of Frederick Jackson Turner," ''The Western Historical Quarterly,''  Vol. 18, No. 2 (Apr., 1987), pp. 157-176 [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0043-3810(198704)18%3A2%3C157%3ARTVFTL%3E2.0.CO%3B2-G online at JSTOR]
* Cronon, William, George Miles, and Jay Gitlin, eds. ''Under an Open Sky: Rethinking America's Western Past'' (1992)
* Etulain, Richard W. ''Does the Frontier Experience Make America Exceptional?'' (1999)
* Etulain, Richard W. ''Writing Western History: Essays on Major Western Historians'' (2002)
* Etulain, Richard W. and Gerald D. Nash, eds. ''Researching Western History: Topics in the Twentieth Century'' (1997)] [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=89052336 online edition]
* Faragher, John Mack, ed.''Rereading Frederick Jackson Turner: "The Significance of the Frontier in American History" and other essays'', (1999) [http://www.amazon.com/Rereading-Frederick-Jackson-Turner-Significance/dp/0300075936/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1207471478&sr=8-1 excerpt  and text search]
* Faragher, John Mack. "The Frontier Trail: Rethinking Turner and Reimagining the American West," ''The American Historical Review'' 98, no. 1 (February, 1993) [http://www.jstor.org/pss/2166384 in JSTOR]
* Hine, Robert V.  and John Mack Faragher. ''The American West: A New Interpretive History'' (2000), deals with events, not historiography
* Hofstadter, Richard. ''The Progressive Historians—Turner, Beard, Parrington.'' (1979), highly influential critique
*  Hutton, T.R.C. "Beating a Dead Horse?: The Continuing Presence of Frederick Jackson Turner in Environmental and Western History." ''International Social Science Review.'' (2002) pp 47+. [http://www.questia.com/read/5000838961?title=Beating%20a%20Dead%20Horse%3f%3a%20The%20Continuing%20Presence%20of%20Frederick%20Jackson%20Turner%20in%20Environmental%20and%20Western%20History online edition]
* Jacobs, Wilbur R. ''On Turner's Trail: 100 Years of Writing Western History'' (1994).
* Jensen, Richard. "On Modernizing Frederick Jackson Turner," ''Western Historical Quarterly'' 11 (1980), 307-20. [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0043-3810(198007)11%3A3%3C307%3AOMFJTT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-E in JSTOR]
* Lamar, Howard R. ed. ''The New Encyclopedia of the American West'' (1998), 1000+ pages of articles by scholars
* Limerick, Patricia Nelson. "Turnerians All: The Dream of a Helpful History in an Intelligible World," ''The American Historical Review,'' Vol. 100, No. 3 (Jun., 1995), pp. 697-716 [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-8762(199506)100%3A3%3C697%3ATATDOA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-9 online at JSTOR]
* Limerick, Patricia Nelson, Clyde A. Milner, and Charles E. Rankin, eds. ''Trails: Toward a New Western History'' (1991)
* Milner, Clyde A., II ed. ''Major Problems in the History of the American West'' 2nd ed (1997), primary sources and essays by scholars
* Nash,  Gerald D. ''Creating the West: Historical Interpretations, 1890-1990'' (1991)
* Nichols, Roger L. ed. ''American Frontier and Western Issues: An Historiographical Review'' (1986) essays by 14 scholars
* Paxson, Frederic/ ''History of the American Frontier, 1763-1893'' (1924), textbook
* Paxson, Frederic. ''The Last American Frontier'' (1910) [http://books.google.com/books?id=kWcOAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA1&dq=intitle:frontier&num=30&as_brr=1&rview=1 full text online]
* Slotkin, Richard. ''Regeneration through Violence: The Mythology of the American Frontier, 1600-1800'' (1973), complex literary reinterpretation of the frontier myth from its origins in Europe to Daniel Boone [http://www.amazon.com/Regeneration-Through-Violence-Mythology-1600-1860/dp/0806132299/ref=sr_1_2/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190847431&sr=1-2 excerpt and text search]
* Slotkin, Richard. ''The Fatal Environment: The Myth of the Frontier in the Age of Industrialization, 1800-1890'' (1998) [http://www.amazon.com/Fatal-Environment-Frontier-Industrialization-1800-1890/dp/080613030X/ref=sr_1_3/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190847431&sr=1-3 excerpt and text search]
* Slotkin, Richard. ''Gunfighter Nation: The Myth of the Frontier in Twentieth-Century America'' (1998), images of the west [http://www.amazon.com/Gunfighter-Nation-Frontier-Twentieth-Century-America/dp/0806130318/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190847431&sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]
* Steiner, Michael C. "From Frontier to Region: Frederick Jackson Turner and the New Western History," ''Pacific Historical Review'' 64 (November 1995): 479-501 [http://www.jstor.org/pss/3640555 in JSTOR]
*Turner, Frederick Jackson. ''The Frontier in American History.'' 375 pp. (1920), Pulitzer prize [http://xroads.virginia.edu/~Hyper/TURNER/ online edition]
* White, Richard, and Patricia Nelson Limerick. ''The Frontier in American Culture'' (1995), critique by advocates of the "New Western History"


==See also==
==See also==

Revision as of 07:26, 13 February 2009

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

The Frontier Thesis or Turner Thesis is the conclusion of Frederick Jackson Turner that the wellsprings of American character and vitality have always been the American frontier, the region between civilized society and the untamed wilderness. In the thesis, the frontier created freedom, "breaking the bonds of custom, offering new experiences, [and] calling out new institutions and activities."

Origins

Writers such as Ralph Waldo Emerson had speculated on the importance of the west, and Theodore Roosevelt wrote a full-scale history of the Tennessee frontier that argued the experience formed a new "race" -- the American people. Turner drew on his knowledge of evolution, and his own research into the fur trade frontier. He first announced his thesis in a paper entitled "The Significance of the Frontier in American History," delivered to the American Historical Association in 1893 at the World Columbian Exposition in Chicago. The thesis dominated much of scholarship until the 1960s. It was then challenged by the "New Western Historians," who ignored its valid conclusions but instead charged that it ignored ethnic minorities and women and was too praiseworthy of the pioneers.

West1854.jpg

Evolutionary model

Turner set up an evolutionary model (he had studied evolution with a leading geologist), using the time dimension of American history, and the geographical space of the land that became the United States. His argument was that the new environment had caused a rapid evolution of social and political characteristics, thereby creating the true "American." The first settlers who arrived on the east coast in the 17th century acted and thought like Europeans. They encountered a new environmental challenge that was quite different from what they had known. The most important difference was vast amounts of unused high quality farmland (some of which was used by a few thousand Indians for hunting grounds.) They adapted to the new environment in certain ways — the sum of all the adaptations over the years would make them Americans. The next generation moved further inland. It discarded more European aspects that were no longer useful, for example established churches, established aristocracies, intrusive government, and control of the best land by a small gentry class. Every generation moved further west and became more American, and the settlers became more democratic and less tolerant of hierarchy. They became more violent, more individualistic, more distrustful of authority, less artistic, less scientific, and more dependent on ad-hoc organizations they formed themselves. In broad terms, the further west, the more American the community.

Merle Curti, one of Turner's last students in 1944 won the Pulitzer Prize in history for The Growth of American Thought. Curti adapted Turner's frontier thesis to intellectual history, arguing, "Because the American environment, physical and social, differed from that of Europe, Americans, confronted by different needs and problems, adapted the European intellectual heritage in their own way. And because American life came increasingly to differ from European life, American ideas, American agencies of intellectual life, and the use made of knowledge likewise came to differ in America from their European counterparts." (p vi) His book was not so much a history of American thought as a social history of American thought, with strong attention to the social and economic forces that shaped that thought.

Impact of thesis

Turner's thesis quickly became popular among intellectuals, as well as spokesmen for the west. It explained why the American people and American government were so different from Europeans. It sounded an alarming note about the future, since the U.S. Census of 1890 had officially stated that the American frontier line (separating the more-settled and lighty settled zones) had broken up. The idea that the source of America's power and uniqueness was gone was a distressing concept for some intellectuals. Some talked about overseas expansion as a new frontier; others (like John F. Kennedy) called for a "new frontier" of achievement. Despite criticism, Turner's theory entered its second century "in remarkably good shape."[1]


See also

notes

  1. Limerick (1995) p 697