Talk:Sexual dimorphism: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Andrew Chong
(Definition?)
imported>Aleta Curry
(Good question--I don't know-need the biologists)
Line 14: Line 14:


I changed the definition slightly to define sexual dimorphisms as physical differences not including the difference in sex organs. Is it part of the definition that sexual dimorphisms ''must'' be readily apparent, or is this just generally the case? If they must be readily apparent, the definition should be modified accordingly.
I changed the definition slightly to define sexual dimorphisms as physical differences not including the difference in sex organs. Is it part of the definition that sexual dimorphisms ''must'' be readily apparent, or is this just generally the case? If they must be readily apparent, the definition should be modified accordingly.
:You forgot to sign :P
:I always think of this as readily apparent differences in animals, which would make both the new edit and the addition of plants with different sexual components inaccurate.  I'm not a biologist, so I think we'll have to ask the experts.
:[[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 22:57, 1 August 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 21:57, 1 August 2007


Article Checklist for "Sexual dimorphism"
Workgroup category or categories Biology Workgroup, Agriculture Workgroup, Hobbies Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Stub: no more than a few sentences
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by David Martin 21:41, 15 May 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Definition?

I changed the definition slightly to define sexual dimorphisms as physical differences not including the difference in sex organs. Is it part of the definition that sexual dimorphisms must be readily apparent, or is this just generally the case? If they must be readily apparent, the definition should be modified accordingly.

You forgot to sign :P
I always think of this as readily apparent differences in animals, which would make both the new edit and the addition of plants with different sexual components inaccurate. I'm not a biologist, so I think we'll have to ask the experts.
Aleta Curry 22:57, 1 August 2007 (CDT)