Talk:Gymnastics: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Tom Kelly No edit summary |
imported>Robert W King No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
We do have a picture of [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Image:Nadia_Comaneci.jpg Nadia] --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 14:30, 11 June 2007 (CDT) | We do have a picture of [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Image:Nadia_Comaneci.jpg Nadia] --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 14:30, 11 June 2007 (CDT) | ||
:What is the resolution of that picture? Is there somewhere where that is listed? I don't actually know much about resolution and megapixels, etc. To say it bluntly, is the picture too blurry? [[User:Tom Kelly|Tom Kelly]] 14:38, 11 June 2007 (CDT) | :What is the resolution of that picture? Is there somewhere where that is listed? I don't actually know much about resolution and megapixels, etc. To say it bluntly, is the picture too blurry? [[User:Tom Kelly|Tom Kelly]] 14:38, 11 June 2007 (CDT) | ||
::It looks like it was enlarged from the original source. There's a fair amount of noise, some image resolution loss, a little bit of jpeg artifacting. It's usable but I wouldn't consider it "great".--[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 14:44, 11 June 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 13:44, 11 June 2007
I just have to go now, but I will expand it. Jordan Goldberg 06:06, 11 June 2007 (CDT)
I need an example of combinations getting bonus points or tricks elevated in level. I added a section on vocabulary and tried to define "trick." I also added 2 helpful links. Tom Kelly 14:24, 11 June 2007 (CDT)
We do have a picture of Nadia --Matt Innis (Talk) 14:30, 11 June 2007 (CDT)
- What is the resolution of that picture? Is there somewhere where that is listed? I don't actually know much about resolution and megapixels, etc. To say it bluntly, is the picture too blurry? Tom Kelly 14:38, 11 June 2007 (CDT)
- It looks like it was enlarged from the original source. There's a fair amount of noise, some image resolution loss, a little bit of jpeg artifacting. It's usable but I wouldn't consider it "great".--Robert W King 14:44, 11 June 2007 (CDT)