Talk:Glossary of cricket: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>John Leach (answer to queries) |
imported>Chris Day No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
This really belongs on [[Cricket/Related Articles]]. See [[CZ:Definitions]] and [[CZ:Related Articles]] for why. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 14:54, 25 September 2007 (CDT) | This really belongs on [[Cricket/Related Articles]]. See [[CZ:Definitions]] and [[CZ:Related Articles]] for why. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 14:54, 25 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 01:21, 15 October 2007
This really belongs on Cricket/Related Articles. See CZ:Definitions and CZ:Related Articles for why. --Larry Sanger 14:54, 25 September 2007 (CDT)
- It would also be appropriate to move it to Cricket/Catalogs, no? Or do you mean that all of these terms are subtopics of Cricket and will get their own pages? --Joe Quick (Talk) 18:07, 25 September 2007 (CDT)
It's already in Cricket (sport)/Related Articles and, yes, some of the terms would eventually be expanded into full articles. --John Leach 00:41, 29 September 2007 (CDT)