Talk:B (letter): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Ro Thorpe No edit summary |
imported>Robert W King No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm not sure we should have an article on every letter of the alphabet when dictionaries cover just about everything you need to know. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 17:27, 20 November 2007 (CST) | I'm not sure we should have an article on every letter of the alphabet when dictionaries cover just about everything you need to know. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 17:27, 20 November 2007 (CST) | ||
:There needs to be more, about the history, and its use in other languages. And dictionaries don't describe the use of a letter, they list its occurences in initial position, and give definitions - [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 18:54, 20 November 2007 (CST) | :There needs to be more, about the history, and its use in other languages. And dictionaries don't describe the use of a letter, they list its occurences in initial position, and give definitions - [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 18:54, 20 November 2007 (CST) | ||
::What I am suggesting I guess is would an article on the [[alphabet]] be better? --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 19:31, 20 November 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 19:31, 20 November 2007
I'm not sure we should have an article on every letter of the alphabet when dictionaries cover just about everything you need to know. --Robert W King 17:27, 20 November 2007 (CST)
- There needs to be more, about the history, and its use in other languages. And dictionaries don't describe the use of a letter, they list its occurences in initial position, and give definitions - Ro Thorpe 18:54, 20 November 2007 (CST)
- What I am suggesting I guess is would an article on the alphabet be better? --Robert W King 19:31, 20 November 2007 (CST)