Talk:History of the United States of America: Difference between revisions
imported>D. Matt Innis No edit summary |
imported>Richard Jensen (→Brits: new section) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Am I going in too much detail, or too little? [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 08:50, 5 December 2007 (CST) | Am I going in too much detail, or too little? [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 08:50, 5 December 2007 (CST) | ||
:::I think the level of detail is about right. good job. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 09:33, 5 December 2007 (CST) | :::I think the level of detail is about right. good job. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 09:33, 5 December 2007 (CST) | ||
== Brits == | |||
I think using a British textbook adds perspective (good) and British spellings (bad). We should avoid Brogan-like essays here and keep the narrative and overall outline clear. Eventually we will have multiple spinoff articles, and then we can reduce some of the detail here. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 07:33, 28 December 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 07:33, 28 December 2007
Is there a better title for "The Rise of the New Right"? I'll leave it to your discretion Richard. Denis Cavanagh 13:09, 4 December 2007 (CST)
- I'd also add that I'm not sure "Liberalisation" is a word. --Robert W King 13:11, 4 December 2007 (CST)
It sounds like a word! Denis Cavanagh 13:12, 4 December 2007 (CST)
- "rise of new right" sounds OK to me. Keep the material coming--it's great. Richard Jensen 13:28, 4 December 2007 (CST)
periods
Richard, how detailed are you looking to build the article lists under each time period? --Todd Coles 17:41, 4 December 2007 (CST)
- well this has to be a very general article. People should go to the specialty articles I think Richard Jensen 17:46, 4 December 2007 (CST)
Am I going in too much detail, or too little? Denis Cavanagh 08:50, 5 December 2007 (CST)
- I think the level of detail is about right. good job. Richard Jensen 09:33, 5 December 2007 (CST)
Brits
I think using a British textbook adds perspective (good) and British spellings (bad). We should avoid Brogan-like essays here and keep the narrative and overall outline clear. Eventually we will have multiple spinoff articles, and then we can reduce some of the detail here. Richard Jensen 07:33, 28 December 2007 (CST)