Talk:V (letter): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>John Stephenson |
imported>Ro Thorpe |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The Roman numerals would go fine in the intro. However, I think we really need two articles here, as what you have added is about the sound. A separate article on [[/v/ (sound)]] with a link from the letter article? (I tried putting the phonetic square brackets in there but it didn't work, so I substituted the phonemic //). [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 08:54, 1 April 2008 (CDT) | The Roman numerals would go fine in the intro. However, I think we really need two articles here, as what you have added is about the sound. A separate article on [[/v/ (sound)]] with a link from the letter article? (I tried putting the phonetic square brackets in there but it didn't work, so I substituted the phonemic //). [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 08:54, 1 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
:OK, maybe [[/v/ (phoneme)]] would be better. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 09:03, 1 April 2008 (CDT) | :OK, maybe [[/v/ (phoneme)]] would be better. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 09:03, 1 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
Yes, fine. [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 09:28, 1 April 2008 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 08:28, 1 April 2008
Roman numerals
Should we disambiguate pages like this given they could also be Roman numerals? C, D, I, M and I would also need these. John Stephenson 03:08, 1 April 2008 (CDT)
The Roman numerals would go fine in the intro. However, I think we really need two articles here, as what you have added is about the sound. A separate article on /v/ (sound) with a link from the letter article? (I tried putting the phonetic square brackets in there but it didn't work, so I substituted the phonemic //). Ro Thorpe 08:54, 1 April 2008 (CDT)
- OK, maybe /v/ (phoneme) would be better. John Stephenson 09:03, 1 April 2008 (CDT)
Yes, fine. Ro Thorpe 09:28, 1 April 2008 (CDT)