Talk:English spellings: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Hayford Peirce (→a strange disaster: baffled by *disāsterous) |
imported>Ro Thorpe (→a strange disaster: *kor *blymi! *nok me *dahn *wiv a *fevver) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I gotta say that I don't understand | I gotta say that I don't understand | ||
*disāsterous at all. I changed it to what seemed to me to be correct, but you've changed it back. I imagine, with a reason. But if I'm baffled by this inexplicable form/word, I imagine that others will be too. What's the scoop on this baby? [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 19:21, 12 March 2008 (CDT) | *disāsterous at all. I changed it to what seemed to me to be correct, but you've changed it back. I imagine, with a reason. But if I'm baffled by this inexplicable form/word, I imagine that others will be too. What's the scoop on this baby? [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 19:21, 12 March 2008 (CDT) | ||
:Yes, that was before I explained the all-important asterisk. Have a look at the first paragraph again: I think it is now *cleer. [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 09:21, 13 March 2008 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 08:21, 13 March 2008
It is too arduous to edit my Word list to include only homophones, hence the name change. All the homophones will still be there, locatable by the equals sign. Ro Thorpe = Reaux Zourpe 16:27, 12 March 2008 (CDT)
a strange disaster
I gotta say that I don't understand
- disāsterous at all. I changed it to what seemed to me to be correct, but you've changed it back. I imagine, with a reason. But if I'm baffled by this inexplicable form/word, I imagine that others will be too. What's the scoop on this baby? Hayford Peirce 19:21, 12 March 2008 (CDT)
- Yes, that was before I explained the all-important asterisk. Have a look at the first paragraph again: I think it is now *cleer. Ro Thorpe 09:21, 13 March 2008 (CDT)