Talk:Cosmology: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>José Leonardo Andrade
(→‎Bolded words: new section)
imported>J. Noel Chiappa
Line 4: Line 4:


Why does the article bold so many words? Shouldn't those words be internal links instead?--[[User:José Leonardo Andrade|José Leonardo Andrade]] 10:10, 11 January 2008 (CST)
Why does the article bold so many words? Shouldn't those words be internal links instead?--[[User:José Leonardo Andrade|José Leonardo Andrade]] 10:10, 11 January 2008 (CST)
== Historical cosmologies ==
I'd be tempted to move a lot of these (Sumerian, etc, etc) out to a separate page/article (if an article, [[Historical cosmologies]], or something like that), and leave this article be just the current scientific stuff. Sure, we should give a brief summary of these historical things, and we should also cover the development of today's cosmology, but I fear that doing all these in one page will make it to long. [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 20:12, 20 March 2008 (CDT)

Revision as of 19:12, 20 March 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Video [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition A branch of astronomy and of metaphysics committed to the study of the universe as a whole, of the contents, structure, and evolution of the universe from the beginning of time to the future. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Philosophy, Astronomy and Physics [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Bolded words

Why does the article bold so many words? Shouldn't those words be internal links instead?--José Leonardo Andrade 10:10, 11 January 2008 (CST)

Historical cosmologies

I'd be tempted to move a lot of these (Sumerian, etc, etc) out to a separate page/article (if an article, Historical cosmologies, or something like that), and leave this article be just the current scientific stuff. Sure, we should give a brief summary of these historical things, and we should also cover the development of today's cosmology, but I fear that doing all these in one page will make it to long. J. Noel Chiappa 20:12, 20 March 2008 (CDT)