Talk:Kenya: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Denis Cavanagh No edit summary |
imported>J. Noel Chiappa (Should the intro be more timeless?) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
==History== | |||
The very brief treatmeant of Kenya's History is not laziness or Eurocentricism or anything like that; I know very little about Kenya's history. I'll leave to others to add to it. [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 16:27, 4 January 2008 (CST) | The very brief treatmeant of Kenya's History is not laziness or Eurocentricism or anything like that; I know very little about Kenya's history. I'll leave to others to add to it. [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 16:27, 4 January 2008 (CST) | ||
==Recent violence== | |||
Is it really best to have the intro mention the recent violence in such a major way? I'd have thought the intro section should provide more of an overview of the country, not 'what's latest'. Sure, it can mention the current challenges the country faces, but the details of the recent events are likely to be less important shortly, and I'd like to see an intro which is more lasting. [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 00:47, 16 April 2008 (CDT) |
Revision as of 23:47, 15 April 2008
History
The very brief treatmeant of Kenya's History is not laziness or Eurocentricism or anything like that; I know very little about Kenya's history. I'll leave to others to add to it. Denis Cavanagh 16:27, 4 January 2008 (CST)
Recent violence
Is it really best to have the intro mention the recent violence in such a major way? I'd have thought the intro section should provide more of an overview of the country, not 'what's latest'. Sure, it can mention the current challenges the country faces, but the details of the recent events are likely to be less important shortly, and I'd like to see an intro which is more lasting. J. Noel Chiappa 00:47, 16 April 2008 (CDT)