Talk:Accidental release source terms/Draft: Difference between revisions
imported>Milton Beychok (Created the Talk subpage) |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (→Looks ready for approval: new section) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I was the original creator and major contributor to the Wikipedia article. I have reworded parts of it and made a few other changes to make it suitable for Citizendium. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 19:03, 22 February 2008 (CST) | I was the original creator and major contributor to the Wikipedia article. I have reworded parts of it and made a few other changes to make it suitable for Citizendium. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 19:03, 22 February 2008 (CST) | ||
== Looks ready for approval == | |||
I added a few related terms and started/updated some emergency management and decontamination. You may well know more about decontaminating fuel spills than I do; that's on the list. | |||
Did you want to include any meteorological information? | |||
I'd like to align the table of contents a bit, and there are a couple of sub-references whose formatting I'd like to examine. Personally, I like the 2-column reflist, but that's certainly your call. | |||
Otherwise, are you happy with having it approved? I will be looking at some thing below it as well. You have no idea how pleasant it is to be reading this as a relief from [[homeopathy]] | |||
[[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 17:43, 23 October 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:43, 23 October 2008
Wikipedia has an article with the same title
I was the original creator and major contributor to the Wikipedia article. I have reworded parts of it and made a few other changes to make it suitable for Citizendium. Milton Beychok 19:03, 22 February 2008 (CST)
Looks ready for approval
I added a few related terms and started/updated some emergency management and decontamination. You may well know more about decontaminating fuel spills than I do; that's on the list.
Did you want to include any meteorological information?
I'd like to align the table of contents a bit, and there are a couple of sub-references whose formatting I'd like to examine. Personally, I like the 2-column reflist, but that's certainly your call.
Otherwise, are you happy with having it approved? I will be looking at some thing below it as well. You have no idea how pleasant it is to be reading this as a relief from homeopathy
Howard C. Berkowitz 17:43, 23 October 2008 (UTC)