Talk:Animalia: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Joshua Choi |
imported>Hayford Peirce (→Should "Animalia" be merged with "Animal"?: I thnk they're related but distinct) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I think that there is a very good chance that this article will become redundant with "Animal" (or vice versa). Do you all think that one should be merged with "Animal", while both articles are still short? And if so, in which direction do you think the merge should occur? [[User:Joshua Choi|Joshua Choi]] 18:01, 28 March 2009 (UTC) | I think that there is a very good chance that this article will become redundant with "Animal" (or vice versa). Do you all think that one should be merged with "Animal", while both articles are still short? And if so, in which direction do you think the merge should occur? [[User:Joshua Choi|Joshua Choi]] 18:01, 28 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
:I'm certainly not an expert on the subject, but I think we're talking about two related but different things here. I doubt if they will ever be merged. I could be wrong -- certainly some experts in the field will be able to advise us. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 18:13, 28 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:13, 28 March 2009
Should "Animalia" be merged with "Animal"?
I think that there is a very good chance that this article will become redundant with "Animal" (or vice versa). Do you all think that one should be merged with "Animal", while both articles are still short? And if so, in which direction do you think the merge should occur? Joshua Choi 18:01, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'm certainly not an expert on the subject, but I think we're talking about two related but different things here. I doubt if they will ever be merged. I could be wrong -- certainly some experts in the field will be able to advise us. Hayford Peirce 18:13, 28 March 2009 (UTC)