Talk:Animalia: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Joshua Choi
imported>Joshua Choi
Line 3: Line 3:
== Should "Animalia" be merged with "Animal"? ==
== Should "Animalia" be merged with "Animal"? ==


I think that there is a very good chance that this article will become redundant with "Animal" (or vice versa). Do you all think that one should be merged with "Animal", while both articles are still short? And if so, in which direction do you think the merge should occur?
I think that there is a very good chance that this article will become redundant with "Animal" (or vice versa). Do you all think that one should be merged with "Animal", while both articles are still short? And if so, in which direction do you think the merge should occur? [[User:Joshua Choi|Joshua Choi]] 18:01, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:01, 28 March 2009

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  The taxonomic kingdom including all animals. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category:  Biology [Editors asked to check categories]
 Subgroup category:  Zoology
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English

Should "Animalia" be merged with "Animal"?

I think that there is a very good chance that this article will become redundant with "Animal" (or vice versa). Do you all think that one should be merged with "Animal", while both articles are still short? And if so, in which direction do you think the merge should occur? Joshua Choi 18:01, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Animalia&oldid=493049"