Talk:Ajax Framework: Difference between revisions
imported>Tom Morris (New page: == Don't agree with the premise of this article == I'm acquaintances with a fair few front-end web developers, and I rarely ever hear them talk about "AJAX frameworks" (first of all, becau...) |
imported>Pat Palmer (need a summary overview of market popularity) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Don't agree with the premise of this article == | == Don't agree with the premise of this article == | ||
I'm acquaintances with a fair few front-end web developers, and I rarely ever hear them talk about "AJAX frameworks" (first of all, because "AJAX" is usually "Ajax") - instead they talk about "JavaScript frameworks". Which makes a ton more sense, since the stuff which you most need to hide away behind a framework isn't usually the XMLHttpRequest object but all the other cross-browser crud. I suggest we quickly move this page to "JavaScript framework", and also not include ''any'' library-specific code, which should probably be on the pages for the relevant libraries: [[Dojo (framework)]], [[jQuery]], [[Prototype (framework)]], [[script.aculo.us]], [[MooTools]], [[Yahoo! UI Library]], [[Rico (framework)]] etc. --[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] 17:48, 10 August 2008 (CDT) | I'm acquaintances with a fair few front-end web developers, and I rarely ever hear them talk about "AJAX frameworks" (first of all, because "AJAX" is usually "Ajax") - instead they talk about "JavaScript frameworks". Which makes a ton more sense, since the stuff which you most need to hide away behind a framework isn't usually the XMLHttpRequest object but all the other cross-browser crud. I suggest we quickly move this page to "JavaScript framework", and also not include ''any'' library-specific code, which should probably be on the pages for the relevant libraries: [[Dojo (framework)]], [[jQuery]], [[Prototype (framework)]], [[script.aculo.us]], [[MooTools]], [[Yahoo! UI Library]], [[Rico (framework)]] etc. --[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] 17:48, 10 August 2008 (CDT) | ||
==might as well list them ALL== | |||
article would benefit from an updated something like the one found here: http://www.infoq.com/news/ajaxian-survey | |||
Revision as of 23:17, 11 August 2008
Don't agree with the premise of this article
I'm acquaintances with a fair few front-end web developers, and I rarely ever hear them talk about "AJAX frameworks" (first of all, because "AJAX" is usually "Ajax") - instead they talk about "JavaScript frameworks". Which makes a ton more sense, since the stuff which you most need to hide away behind a framework isn't usually the XMLHttpRequest object but all the other cross-browser crud. I suggest we quickly move this page to "JavaScript framework", and also not include any library-specific code, which should probably be on the pages for the relevant libraries: Dojo (framework), jQuery, Prototype (framework), script.aculo.us, MooTools, Yahoo! UI Library, Rico (framework) etc. --Tom Morris 17:48, 10 August 2008 (CDT)
might as well list them ALL
article would benefit from an updated something like the one found here: http://www.infoq.com/news/ajaxian-survey