Metabolic equivalent: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Robert Badgett
No edit summary
imported>Robert Badgett
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
Alternatives include:
Alternatives include:
* New York Heart Association criteria
* New York Heart Association criteria
* Canadian Cardiovascular Society criteria
* Canadian Cardiovascular Society criteria
* The Duke Activity Status Index<ref name="pmid1927964">{{cite journal |author=Nelson CL, Herndon JE, Mark DB, Pryor DB, Califf RM, Hlatky MA |title=Relation of clinical and angiographic factors to functional capacity as measured by the Duke Activity Status Index |journal=Am. J. Cardiol. |volume=68 |issue=9 |pages=973–5 |year=1991 |month=October |pmid=1927964 |doi= |url=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0002-9149(91)90423-I |issn= |accessdate=2008-09-03}}</ref>
* The Duke Activity Status Index<ref name="pmid2782256">{{cite journal| author=Hlatky MA, Boineau RE, Higginbotham MB, Lee KL, Mark DB, Califf RM et al.| title=A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (the Duke Activity Status Index). | journal=Am J Cardiol | year= 1989 | volume= 64 | issue= 10 | pages= 651-4 | pmid=2782256
| url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=2782256 }} <!--Formatted by http://sumsearch.uthscsa.edu/cite/--></ref><ref name="pmid1927964">{{cite journal |author=Nelson CL, Herndon JE, Mark DB, Pryor DB, Califf RM, Hlatky MA |title=Relation of clinical and angiographic factors to functional capacity as measured by the Duke Activity Status Index |journal=Am. J. Cardiol. |volume=68 |issue=9 |pages=973–5 |year=1991 |month=October |pmid=1927964 |doi= |url=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0002-9149(91)90423-I |issn= |accessdate=2008-09-03}}</ref>
* The Specific Acitivity Scale<ref name="pmid7296795">{{cite journal |author=Goldman L, Hashimoto B, Cook EF, Loscalzo A |title=Comparative reproducibility and validity of systems for assessing cardiovascular functional class: advantages of a new specific activity scale |journal=Circulation |volume=64 |issue=6 |pages=1227–34 |year=1981 |month=December |pmid=7296795 |doi= |url= |issn=}}</ref>
* The Specific Acitivity Scale<ref name="pmid7296795">{{cite journal |author=Goldman L, Hashimoto B, Cook EF, Loscalzo A |title=Comparative reproducibility and validity of systems for assessing cardiovascular functional class: advantages of a new specific activity scale |journal=Circulation |volume=64 |issue=6 |pages=1227–34 |year=1981 |month=December |pmid=7296795 |doi= |url= |issn=}}</ref>



Revision as of 15:17, 5 October 2009

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

In physiology, a metabolic equivalent, or MET, is defined as the ratio of a person's metabolic rate during an activity relative to their basal resting metabolic rate. One MET then is the amount of energy needed to sit quietly.[1][2] More specifically, 1 MET is resting or basal oxygen consumption (VO2) of a 70-kg, 40-year-old man. One MET is 3.5 mL per kg per min.

As an example, walking quickly (3 to 4 miles-per-hour) requires 4 METs.

In a stress test using the Bruce Protocol, stage 1 is 4.8 METs and stage 2 is 7.0 METs.[1]

Alternatives include:

  • New York Heart Association criteria
  • Canadian Cardiovascular Society criteria
  • The Duke Activity Status Index[3][4]
  • The Specific Acitivity Scale[5]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Hill J, Timmis A (May 2002). "Exercise tolerance testing". BMJ 324 (7345): 1084–7. PMID 11991917. PMC 1123032[e]
  2. Measuring Physical Activity - Staying Active - The Nutrition Source - Harvard School of Public Health. Retrieved on 2008-09-03.
  3. Hlatky MA, Boineau RE, Higginbotham MB, Lee KL, Mark DB, Califf RM et al. (1989). "A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (the Duke Activity Status Index).". Am J Cardiol 64 (10): 651-4. PMID 2782256.
  4. Nelson CL, Herndon JE, Mark DB, Pryor DB, Califf RM, Hlatky MA (October 1991). "Relation of clinical and angiographic factors to functional capacity as measured by the Duke Activity Status Index". Am. J. Cardiol. 68 (9): 973–5. PMID 1927964. Retrieved on 2008-09-03. [e]
  5. Goldman L, Hashimoto B, Cook EF, Loscalzo A (December 1981). "Comparative reproducibility and validity of systems for assessing cardiovascular functional class: advantages of a new specific activity scale". Circulation 64 (6): 1227–34. PMID 7296795[e]

External links