Disjoint union: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Richard Pinch (new article, needs work) |
imported>Richard Pinch m (improve TeX) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
The disjoint of any finite number of sets may be defined inductively, as | The disjoint of any finite number of sets may be defined inductively, as | ||
:<math>\coprod_{i=1}^n X_i = X_1 \ | :<math>\coprod_{i=1}^n X_i = X_1 \amalg (X_2 \amalg (X_3 \amalg (\cdots X_n)\cdots))) . \, </math> | ||
The disjoint union of a general family of sets ''X''<sub>λ</sub> as λ ranges over a general index set Λ may be defined as | The disjoint union of a general family of sets ''X''<sub>λ</sub> as λ ranges over a general index set Λ may be defined as |
Revision as of 13:51, 4 November 2008
In mathematics, the disjoint union of two sets X and Y is a set which contains "copies" of each of X and Y: it is denoted or, less often, .
There are injection maps in1 and in2 from X and Y to the disjoint union, which are injective functions with disjoint images.
If X and Y are disjoint, then the usual union is also a disjoint union. In general, the disjoint union can be realised in a number of ways, for example as
The disjoint union has a universal property: if there is a set Z with maps and , then there is a map such that the compositions and .
General unions
The disjoint of any finite number of sets may be defined inductively, as
The disjoint union of a general family of sets Xλ as λ ranges over a general index set Λ may be defined as
References
- Paul Halmos (1960). Naive set theory. Van Nostrand Reinhold, 24.
- Keith J. Devlin (1979). Fundamentals of Contemporary Set Theory. Springer-Verlag, 12. ISBN 0-387-90441-7.