CZ:Ref:DOI:10.1098/rsbl.2005.0333: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen (started) |
imported>Daniel Mietchen (comment) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| url = http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1617168 | | url = http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1617168 | ||
}} | }} | ||
:Based on the analysis of published data on [[body mass]], [[wing area]] and absolute [[brain size]] in 104 species of [[bat]]s, the authors conclude that brain size is a trade-off between cognitive requirements imposed by the natural or social [[environment]], and [[energetic constraint]]s, particularly in relation [[flight]]. | |||
Revision as of 07:45, 29 January 2009
Safi, K.; M.A. Seid & D.K.N. Dechmann (2005), "Bigger is not always better: when brains get smaller", Biology Letters 1 (3): 283–286, DOI:10.1098/rsbl.2005.0333 [e]
- Based on the analysis of published data on body mass, wing area and absolute brain size in 104 species of bats, the authors conclude that brain size is a trade-off between cognitive requirements imposed by the natural or social environment, and energetic constraints, particularly in relation flight.