Metaphor/Bibliography: Difference between revisions
< Metaphor
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Anthony.Sebastian (add biblio item) |
imported>Anthony.Sebastian mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
** Example of how metaphor interpretations can differ. In this case, Darwin's metaphor, "struggle for existence". | ** Example of how metaphor interpretations can differ. In this case, Darwin's metaphor, "struggle for existence". | ||
* Brigitte Nerlich and David D. Clarke. (2001) [http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09526950122120952 Mind, meaning and metaphor: the philosophy and psychology of metaphor in 19th-century Germany.] ''History of the Human Sciences'' 14:39-61. | * Brigitte Nerlich and David D. Clarke. (2001) [http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09526950122120952 Mind, meaning and metaphor: the philosophy and psychology of metaphor in 19th-century Germany.] ''History of the Human Sciences'' 14:39-61. | ||
** '''From Abstract:''' This article explores a German philosophy of metaphor, which proposed a close link between the body and the mind as the basis for metaphor, debunked the view that metaphor is just a decorative rhetorical device and questioned the distinction between the literal and the figurative….thinkers contributed to a philosophy and psychology of the metaphoric according to which metaphors are not only nice, but necessary for the structure and growth of human thought and language. Obvious parallels between this 19th-century philosophy of metaphor and the 20th-century theory of metaphor developed by Lakoff and his followers. | ** '''From Abstract:''' This article explores a German philosophy of metaphor, which proposed a close link between the body and the mind as the basis for metaphor, debunked the view that metaphor is just a decorative rhetorical device and questioned the distinction between the literal and the figurative….thinkers contributed to a philosophy and psychology of the metaphoric according to which metaphors are not only nice, but necessary for the structure and growth of human thought and language. Obvious parallels between this 19th-century philosophy of metaphor and the 20th-century theory of metaphor developed by Lakoff and his followers. | ||
Revision as of 17:06, 17 November 2009
- Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner. For formatting, consider using automated reference wikification.
- Carlos Cornejo. (2007) Review Essay: Conceptualizing Metaphors versus Embodying the Language: Kövecses, Zoltán, Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Culture Psychology 13:474-488.
- Gregory L. Murphy. (1996) On metaphoric representation. Cognition 60:173-204.
- Todesl D. (2009) Global Darwin: Contempt for Competition. Nature 462:36-37.
- Example of how metaphor interpretations can differ. In this case, Darwin's metaphor, "struggle for existence".
- Brigitte Nerlich and David D. Clarke. (2001) Mind, meaning and metaphor: the philosophy and psychology of metaphor in 19th-century Germany. History of the Human Sciences 14:39-61.
- From Abstract: This article explores a German philosophy of metaphor, which proposed a close link between the body and the mind as the basis for metaphor, debunked the view that metaphor is just a decorative rhetorical device and questioned the distinction between the literal and the figurative….thinkers contributed to a philosophy and psychology of the metaphoric according to which metaphors are not only nice, but necessary for the structure and growth of human thought and language. Obvious parallels between this 19th-century philosophy of metaphor and the 20th-century theory of metaphor developed by Lakoff and his followers.