Talk:2012 doomsday prophecy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Thomas Wright Sulcer (created article) |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Created article== | ==Created article== | ||
Traffic driver. Pop culture bunk. But causing much hysteria. Wrote fresh with references.--[[User:Thomas Wright Sulcer|Thomas Wright Sulcer]] 16:53, 15 March 2010 (UTC) | Traffic driver. Pop culture bunk. But causing much hysteria. Wrote fresh with references.--[[User:Thomas Wright Sulcer|Thomas Wright Sulcer]] 16:53, 15 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Just for readability, one citation per sentence is enough in the vast majority of cases. In like manner, if you keep repeating the same citation every few sentences, it tends to cause formatting problems in the footnotes -- they don't work well, especially in 2- or 3-column format, with long lists of the same note. Usually, if there are two citations in a row, the second citation, if relevant, has a different point or perspective to be brought into the article. Otherwise, it feels like WP defensiveness. | |||
:This is meant as constructive advice about style here. Thanks for writing the article. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 18:34, 15 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
==A perspective== | |||
I was the external network architecture consultant for the U.S government [[Y2K]] information center, and saw things that were avoided by the effort -- and two scary incidents caused by noncompliant software. To put this in perspective, someone had made up a sign that got onto the wall of many offices:<blockquote>The [[Dark Ages]] were caused by the Y1K problem</ref> | |||
[[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 18:34, 15 March 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:34, 15 March 2010
Created article
Traffic driver. Pop culture bunk. But causing much hysteria. Wrote fresh with references.--Thomas Wright Sulcer 16:53, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Just for readability, one citation per sentence is enough in the vast majority of cases. In like manner, if you keep repeating the same citation every few sentences, it tends to cause formatting problems in the footnotes -- they don't work well, especially in 2- or 3-column format, with long lists of the same note. Usually, if there are two citations in a row, the second citation, if relevant, has a different point or perspective to be brought into the article. Otherwise, it feels like WP defensiveness.
- This is meant as constructive advice about style here. Thanks for writing the article. Howard C. Berkowitz 18:34, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
A perspective
I was the external network architecture consultant for the U.S government Y2K information center, and saw things that were avoided by the effort -- and two scary incidents caused by noncompliant software. To put this in perspective, someone had made up a sign that got onto the wall of many offices:
The Dark Ages were caused by the Y1K problem</ref>
Howard C. Berkowitz 18:34, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Astronomy Developing Articles
- Astronomy Nonstub Articles
- Astronomy Internal Articles
- Psychology Developing Articles
- Psychology Nonstub Articles
- Psychology Internal Articles
- Media Developing Articles
- Media Nonstub Articles
- Media Internal Articles