User:Tomas Kindahl: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>D. Matt Innis
m (Creating user page with biography of new user.)
 
imported>Tomas Kindahl
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Veteran Wikipedia editor (User:Rursus) that is going to try out Citizendium in order to get a clearer idea what regime is missing in WP to eliminate bullies and desinformers (so called POV-pushers) that are formally keeping policy but deteriorating the articles. My interests regard astronomy, mythology, religion, philosophy, linguistics and history, although I'm a computer "engineer" with some university degrees.
Veteran Wikipedia editor (User:Rursus) that is going to try out Citizendium in order to get a clearer idea what regime is missing in Wikipedia to eliminate bullies and desinformers (so called POV-pushers) that are formally keeping policy but deteriorating the articles. ''However:'' I will forsake neither Wikipedia nor Citizendium – I'm neither a refugee from Wikipedia, nor a dissident, and I like the informal culture of Wikipedia – but the quality of some articles in Wikipedia, not only religion and philosophy, but the ueber-factual tone of some physics articles annoy me, so I will try the Citizendium culture too.
 
My interests regard astronomy, mythology, religion, philosophy, linguistics and history, although I'm a computer "engineer" with some university degrees. I think that the manual [[CZ:Article mechanics]] is just common sense and a ''"but I took that for granted as a Wikipedia article too"''.


[[Category:CZ Authors|Kindahl, Tomas]][[Category:Astronomy Authors|Kindahl, Tomas]]  
[[Category:CZ Authors|Kindahl, Tomas]][[Category:Astronomy Authors|Kindahl, Tomas]]  
{{DEFAULTSORT:Kindahl, Tomas}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Kindahl, Tomas}}

Revision as of 08:12, 14 July 2010

Veteran Wikipedia editor (User:Rursus) that is going to try out Citizendium in order to get a clearer idea what regime is missing in Wikipedia to eliminate bullies and desinformers (so called POV-pushers) that are formally keeping policy but deteriorating the articles. However: I will forsake neither Wikipedia nor Citizendium – I'm neither a refugee from Wikipedia, nor a dissident, and I like the informal culture of Wikipedia – but the quality of some articles in Wikipedia, not only religion and philosophy, but the ueber-factual tone of some physics articles annoy me, so I will try the Citizendium culture too.

My interests regard astronomy, mythology, religion, philosophy, linguistics and history, although I'm a computer "engineer" with some university degrees. I think that the manual CZ:Article mechanics is just common sense and a "but I took that for granted as a Wikipedia article too".