Talk:Obesogenic environment: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Gareth Leng
No edit summary
imported>Gareth Leng
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:


Your summaries are good - you can write fluently and grasp the essence - but remember that the most important thing to capture, for any paper, is not what the authors ''think'' but what the ''evidence'' actually is. Any good article must show the evidence behind the conclusions.[[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 20:14, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Your summaries are good - you can write fluently and grasp the essence - but remember that the most important thing to capture, for any paper, is not what the authors ''think'' but what the ''evidence'' actually is. Any good article must show the evidence behind the conclusions.[[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 20:14, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Good work so far on the article - you're identifying questions in a logically structured way and pucking out key pieces of evidence from strong sources. Be careful to say enough about the evidence to display what the evidence actually shows rather than simply asserting that there is evidence and citing a paper - some details are critical, such as whether these are human studies or studies in rats, and the kind of studies that they are; they may need a little more explanation to make it very clear what the nature of the evidence is. Don't go overboard on this, a few key phrases is all that may be needed.[[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 10:33, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:33, 26 October 2011

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition The theory that the modern way of living encourages the consumption of energy and discourages the expenditure of energy. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Biology, Health Sciences and Eduzendium [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Callum Bateman 17:28, 20 September 2011 (UTC) Amy Douglas 18:17, 20 September 2011 (UTC) Helen Martin 18:41, 3 October 2011 (UTC)


Good pick of papers Helen!Gareth Leng 13:05, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi Callum, I moved the 2 refs you added into the Bibliography page. Nancy Sabatier 12:46, 11 October 2011 (UTC)-

Your summaries are good - you can write fluently and grasp the essence - but remember that the most important thing to capture, for any paper, is not what the authors think but what the evidence actually is. Any good article must show the evidence behind the conclusions.Gareth Leng 20:14, 12 October 2011 (UTC)


Good work so far on the article - you're identifying questions in a logically structured way and pucking out key pieces of evidence from strong sources. Be careful to say enough about the evidence to display what the evidence actually shows rather than simply asserting that there is evidence and citing a paper - some details are critical, such as whether these are human studies or studies in rats, and the kind of studies that they are; they may need a little more explanation to make it very clear what the nature of the evidence is. Don't go overboard on this, a few key phrases is all that may be needed.Gareth Leng 10:33, 26 October 2011 (UTC)