Fiscal multiplier/Tutorials: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner No edit summary |
imported>Nick Gardner No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
<ref>[http://faculty.washington.edu/ezivot/econ584/notes/svar%20survey.pdf Jan Gottschalk: ''An Introduction into the SVAR Methodology: Identification, Interpretation | |||
and Limitations of SVAR models, KielWorking Paper No. 1072, August 2001]</ref> | |||
the | |||
<ref>[http://www.econ.kuleuven.be/ew/academic/intecon/Degrauwe/PDG-papers/Recently_published_articles/PCH2010.pdf Paul De Grauwe ''The scientific foundation of dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models'', Public Choice, 13 July 2010]</ref> | |||
A--> | |||
<ref>[http:// | |||
--> | |||
Revision as of 07:37, 14 November 2012
Christine Romer has argued that that it is "incredibly hard" to estimate the value of a multiplier because fiscal actions are often taken in response to other things happening in the economy, and separating the impact of those other factors from the impact of fiscal change very difficult. Failure to do so can result in omitted-variable bias resulting in an underestimate of the multiplier - an error that Ms Romer believes to be common. [1]