Talk:Nuclear jokes: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(could become an actual discussion, but for now, let's just enjoy)
mNo edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}


== odd sort of article ==
== odd sort of article ==

Latest revision as of 11:38, 28 January 2023

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition memes, video games, miscellaneous nonsense [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Politics, Engineering and Physics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

odd sort of article

Seems a rather odd sort of article. Peter Jackson (talk) 04:44, 25 November 2022 (CST)

Yes, definitely not to be taken seriously. I needed a place to share some of the humor I have encountered in my study of nuclear power. I can move it to my user space, if anyone thinks it might hurt our reputation as a serious encyclopedia. David MacQuigg (talk) 20:02, 14 December 2022 (CST)
It *could* become a more serious article too. Searching in WP shows that TV series such as The Simpsons have been forced to make some episodes unavailable online because of the amount of nuclear jokes people made about them, and there are also sensitivity issues surrounding actual disasters such as Chernobyl. But for now, let's just enjoy these. Pat Palmer (talk) 11:37, 28 January 2023 (CST)