CZ:Anthropology Workgroup: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Lee R. Berger
(adding comments)
imported>Lee R. Berger
(adding comments)
Line 16: Line 16:
*[[Genetics]] - good article needs to move towards approval
*[[Genetics]] - good article needs to move towards approval
*[[Paleoanthropology]]- needs work
*[[Paleoanthropology]]- needs work
*[[Physical anthropology]]
*[[Physical anthropology]] - stub- needs work
*[[Forensic anthropology]]
*[[Forensic anthropology]]
*[[Culture]]
*[[Culture]]
Line 26: Line 26:
*[[Ape]] - needs thoughts on whether this is an appropriate category heading and additions
*[[Ape]] - needs thoughts on whether this is an appropriate category heading and additions
*[[Monkey]]- needs thoughts on whether this is an appropriate category heading and additions
*[[Monkey]]- needs thoughts on whether this is an appropriate category heading and additions
*[[Prosimian]]
*[[Prosimian]] - needs work
*[[Lemur]]
*[[Lemur]] - needs work


I also feel A sub-group needs to be set up to handle each individual species of human ancestor e.g. [[Australopithecus africanus]], all living primate species e.g. [[Homo sapiens]], each major fossil hominin and primate locality e.g. [[Gladysvale]], and each major fossil discovery e.g. [[Taung child]] - (a monumental task but stubs on each to start would be great - go to [[Primate]] to see a comprehensive list of living primates).
I also feel A sub-group needs to be set up to handle each individual species of human ancestor e.g. [[Australopithecus africanus]], all living primate species e.g. [[Homo sapiens]], each major fossil hominin and primate locality e.g. [[Gladysvale]], and each major fossil discovery e.g. [[Taung child]] - (a monumental task but stubs on each to start would be great - go to [[Primate]] to see a comprehensive list of living primates). Also, what about a gallery of all Primate species?

Revision as of 00:06, 21 August 2007

Workgroups are no longer used for group communications, but they still are used to group articles into fields of interest. Each article is assigned to 1-3 Workgroups via the article's Metadata.

Anthropology Workgroup
Anthropology article All articles (340) To Approve (0) Editors: active (0) / inactive (6)
and
Authors: active (178) / inactive (0)
Workgroup Discussion
Recent changes Citable Articles (3)
Subgroups (1)
Checklist-generated categories:

Subpage categories:

Missing subpage categories:

Article statuses:

Priority List
Should we create a priority checklist of articles in this workgroup that need to be completed urgently and move towards approval as soon as possible? We could then begin tackling these one by one and get a structure going in this workgroup? I would propose the following list to start and if you think it’s a good idea just add to the list - or better yet – start or finish an article!
Lee R. Berger 00:50, 21 August 2007 (CDT)

I also feel A sub-group needs to be set up to handle each individual species of human ancestor e.g. Australopithecus africanus, all living primate species e.g. Homo sapiens, each major fossil hominin and primate locality e.g. Gladysvale, and each major fossil discovery e.g. Taung child - (a monumental task but stubs on each to start would be great - go to Primate to see a comprehensive list of living primates). Also, what about a gallery of all Primate species?