History of philosophy of science: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Kristof Moors No edit summary |
imported>Ro Thorpe (hmm, candidate for deletion?) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
The '''philosophy of science''' has always been a part of philosophy and formed part of that of several great philosophers during the ancient and middle ages, even when there was relatively little science around. Modern science itself is heavily influenced by [[Roger Bacon]]'s philosophy. This was followed by the [[rationalism]]-[[empiricism]] debate, which lasted approximately until [[logical positivism]] synthetised both rationalism and empiricism. | |||
Modern science itself | Logical positivism developed the philosophy of science to the level of a separate and mature branch of philosophy. | ||
Logical positivism |
Revision as of 17:06, 30 August 2009
The philosophy of science has always been a part of philosophy and formed part of that of several great philosophers during the ancient and middle ages, even when there was relatively little science around. Modern science itself is heavily influenced by Roger Bacon's philosophy. This was followed by the rationalism-empiricism debate, which lasted approximately until logical positivism synthetised both rationalism and empiricism. Logical positivism developed the philosophy of science to the level of a separate and mature branch of philosophy.