User talk:Sage Ross: Difference between revisions
imported>Steve McCluskey (Hi Sage) |
imported>Chris Day (→Hi Sage: good job rocking the boat) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I checked out Citizendium after seeing your proposal for an article on it at the Wikipedia Signpost/Newsroom/Suggestions. At the moment CZ seems a very empty place, but Logicus has about convinced me that Wikipedia is a fatally flawed concept. [[User:Steve McCluskey|Steve McCluskey]] 22:51, 29 January 2007 (CST) | I checked out Citizendium after seeing your proposal for an article on it at the Wikipedia Signpost/Newsroom/Suggestions. At the moment CZ seems a very empty place, but Logicus has about convinced me that Wikipedia is a fatally flawed concept. [[User:Steve McCluskey|Steve McCluskey]] 22:51, 29 January 2007 (CST) | ||
==welcome== | |||
Thanks for popping in. Hopefully your expertise can be attracted here to guide some of the history of science projects. There is no reason why you cannot contribute to both. As Samsara points out there is no way biology would get a wikipedia GA. The difference is we are trying to produce a '''stable''' and user friendly articles and maintain the flexability as much as possible. Cleary there is room for improvement and I had suggested that Samsara come and join the project here since I thought he might be able to make a difference. Unfortunaltely, Pschemp and he appear to be very cynical of this formatt. A shame, since it is different and has a lot of potential. Not to mention it is a fallacy to think one has to be affiliated with one or the other. Congrats on your adminship and good job rocking the boat. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk)]] 18:02, 24 April 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 18:02, 24 April 2007
| Citizendium Getting Started | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quick Start | About us | Help system | Start a new article | For Wikipedians | |||
Tasks: start a new article • add basic, wanted or requested articles • add definitions • add metadata • edit new pages
Welcome to the Citizendium! We hope you will contribute boldly and well. Here are pointers for a quick start, and see Getting Started for other helpful "startup" links, our help system and CZ:Home for the top menu of community pages. You can test out editing in the sandbox if you'd like. If you need help to get going, the forum is one option. That's also where we discuss policy and proposals. You can ask any user or the editors for help, too. Just put a note on their "talk" page. Again, welcome and have fun! -- ZachPruckowski 21:24, 25 January 2007 (CST)
Hi Sage
I checked out Citizendium after seeing your proposal for an article on it at the Wikipedia Signpost/Newsroom/Suggestions. At the moment CZ seems a very empty place, but Logicus has about convinced me that Wikipedia is a fatally flawed concept. Steve McCluskey 22:51, 29 January 2007 (CST)
welcome
Thanks for popping in. Hopefully your expertise can be attracted here to guide some of the history of science projects. There is no reason why you cannot contribute to both. As Samsara points out there is no way biology would get a wikipedia GA. The difference is we are trying to produce a stable and user friendly articles and maintain the flexability as much as possible. Cleary there is room for improvement and I had suggested that Samsara come and join the project here since I thought he might be able to make a difference. Unfortunaltely, Pschemp and he appear to be very cynical of this formatt. A shame, since it is different and has a lot of potential. Not to mention it is a fallacy to think one has to be affiliated with one or the other. Congrats on your adminship and good job rocking the boat. Chris Day (talk) 18:02, 24 April 2007 (CDT)