Talk:Snake (animal): Difference between revisions
imported>Nancy Sculerati MD mNo edit summary |
imported>Nancy Sculerati MD (Format: Derivation and use of word/triple line/Body of article) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Removed line about "old synonym for snakes". It's perfectly acceptable to call a snake a serpent, this is a current synonym. [[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 10:05, 29 January 2007 (CST) | Removed line about "old synonym for snakes". It's perfectly acceptable to call a snake a serpent, this is a current synonym. [[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 10:05, 29 January 2007 (CST) | ||
== Format: Derivation and use of word/triple line/Body of article == | |||
I would like to make a case for adopting this as Citizendium style. I think it has the advantage of keeping all the word origin and use stuff, but- especially if it became standard and users would learn that the actual article starts after the triple line- not muddying up the introduction with this stuff. [[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 10:09, 29 January 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 11:09, 29 January 2007
Beginning to rewrite this article with 2 goals in mind: (1) using language that maintains the interest of the general reader and (2) fitting the subject into biological science. Please join me!Nancy Sculerati MD 09:58, 29 January 2007 (CST)
Removed line about "old synonym for snakes". It's perfectly acceptable to call a snake a serpent, this is a current synonym. Nancy Sculerati MD 10:05, 29 January 2007 (CST)
Format: Derivation and use of word/triple line/Body of article
I would like to make a case for adopting this as Citizendium style. I think it has the advantage of keeping all the word origin and use stuff, but- especially if it became standard and users would learn that the actual article starts after the triple line- not muddying up the introduction with this stuff. Nancy Sculerati MD 10:09, 29 January 2007 (CST)