Talk:Quantum mechanics: Difference between revisions
imported>Bruce M. Tindall (big cleanup) |
imported>Aleksander Stos (category question) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
I categorized this as status "Developing" because, although there have been a couple of major revisions or additions (the "Effects" and "History" sections), the vast majority of the text is still a near-verbatim copy of the Wikipedia article. [[User:Bruce M.Tindall|Bruce M.Tindall]] 16:25, 5 April 2007 (CDT) | I categorized this as status "Developing" because, although there have been a couple of major revisions or additions (the "Effects" and "History" sections), the vast majority of the text is still a near-verbatim copy of the Wikipedia article. [[User:Bruce M.Tindall|Bruce M.Tindall]] 16:25, 5 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
==Math?== | |||
There is a question how do we manage quantum mechanics articles, i.e. whether we put it under Math Workgroup or not. [[User:Jitse Niesen]] has just removed the math category. Consider however this post by [[User:Greg Woodhouse]] on forum. I'm leaning to Greg's point of view. See also AMS classification on [[CZ:Mathematics Workgroup]], quantum theory is a notable node. Any thoughts? --[[User:Aleksander Stos|AlekStos]] 09:24, 16 April 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 08:24, 16 April 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Physics Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | No |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Bruce M.Tindall |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
I categorized this as status "Developing" because, although there have been a couple of major revisions or additions (the "Effects" and "History" sections), the vast majority of the text is still a near-verbatim copy of the Wikipedia article. Bruce M.Tindall 16:25, 5 April 2007 (CDT)
Math?
There is a question how do we manage quantum mechanics articles, i.e. whether we put it under Math Workgroup or not. User:Jitse Niesen has just removed the math category. Consider however this post by User:Greg Woodhouse on forum. I'm leaning to Greg's point of view. See also AMS classification on CZ:Mathematics Workgroup, quantum theory is a notable node. Any thoughts? --AlekStos 09:24, 16 April 2007 (CDT)
- Physics Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Physics Advanced Articles
- Physics Nonstub Articles
- Physics Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Physics Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Physics Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Physics Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Physics External Articles
- Physics Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Physics Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup