User talk:Yi Zhe Wu: Difference between revisions
imported>Charles F. Radley (==Exploration of the Moon==) |
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Please explain why the Category "Exploration of the Moon" was removed from [[Apollo]]. [[User:Charles F. Radley|Charles F. Radley]] 10:01, 22 September 2007 (CDT) | Please explain why the Category "Exploration of the Moon" was removed from [[Apollo]]. [[User:Charles F. Radley|Charles F. Radley]] 10:01, 22 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
== Image copyright == | |||
I have reverted your changes to the caption of the photo of Queen Elizabeth II, becayuse the photo says it is public domain, but you have put a copyright symbol under the photo in the article. This is wrong: if you are in doubt, consult with Stephen Ewen about image copyright. Sorry to complain, I am sure you thought it was the right thing to do! --[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 22:53, 6 October 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 21:53, 6 October 2007
Prohibition
Hey, I read over your article Prohibition of alcohol, United States because I saw you had requested feedback. It's a pretty good start, overall, briefly covering the important aspects of the topic. I did make some edits for grammar and clarity. One thing I think you should consider is renaming the article, because the current title is quite awkward. How about Prohibition in the United States, or simply Prohibition? I don't think you need to clarify "of alcohol", because the term almost always refers to the historic prohibition of alcohol. --Carl Jantzen 15:46, 22 August 2007 (CDT)
- I submitted an enhanced photo for the article. See talk page. --Robert W King 15:53, 22 August 2007 (CDT)
Exploration of the Moon
Please explain why the Category "Exploration of the Moon" was removed from Apollo. Charles F. Radley 10:01, 22 September 2007 (CDT)
Image copyright
I have reverted your changes to the caption of the photo of Queen Elizabeth II, becayuse the photo says it is public domain, but you have put a copyright symbol under the photo in the article. This is wrong: if you are in doubt, consult with Stephen Ewen about image copyright. Sorry to complain, I am sure you thought it was the right thing to do! --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 22:53, 6 October 2007 (CDT)