Talk:Republicanism, U.S.: Difference between revisions
imported>D. Matt Innis (→Outstanding: yup) |
imported>Stephen Ewen |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
I agree this article is one of a kind. Makes me want to home school my kids ;-) I'd just let them read Richards work! --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 22:44, 11 September 2007 (CDT) | I agree this article is one of a kind. Makes me want to home school my kids ;-) I'd just let them read Richards work! --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 22:44, 11 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
:Roger, you are meaning as a ''signed article'', as a subpaged article, right? Assuming yes, of which article would it be subpage? | |||
:Richard, for what its worth, I agree this is indeed a very interesting essay in that vein. | |||
: —[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] [[User talk:Stephen Ewen|(Talk)]] 22:46, 11 September 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 21:46, 11 September 2007
Workgroup category or categories | History Workgroup, Politics Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | External article: from another source, with little change |
Underlinked article? | No |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Petréa Mitchell 14:55, 12 May 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
authorship
this version is entirely by CZ editor Richard Jensen, who wrote the Wiki article under "Rjensen". Richard Jensen 15:13, 12 May 2007 (CDT)
Outstanding
I am not certain what the process for this is, but this essay is a real jewel and clearly the tightly crafted product of a single author, even without the note above. It is hard for me to see how any additional contributions by others could improve it, and therefore I would like to nominate it as an authored piece (perhaps tied in someway into the more generic, multi-authored Republicanism entry.)
After making a few copy-editing changes and a couple of questions, I intend to nominate this article for approval as an authored piece.
- One question for the author is - in the historiography section, is it possible to state briefly the positions of the Cambridge School and the St. Louis School?
- My only other question is whether it would be possible for the author to write a brief concluding paragraph? Things just sort of stop currently, and while the discordant Bush-Kerry exchange is suitably and appropriately neutral, its location so near the end and the trivial partisan bickering it reminds us of sort of ends this wonderful piece on a sour note.
Roger Lohmann 21:26, 11 September 2007 (CDT)
- hey thanks! I'll work of the two very good suggestions. Richard Jensen 21:57, 11 September 2007 (CDT)
I agree this article is one of a kind. Makes me want to home school my kids ;-) I'd just let them read Richards work! --Matt Innis (Talk) 22:44, 11 September 2007 (CDT)
- Roger, you are meaning as a signed article, as a subpaged article, right? Assuming yes, of which article would it be subpage?
- Richard, for what its worth, I agree this is indeed a very interesting essay in that vein.
- —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 22:46, 11 September 2007 (CDT)
- History Category Check
- General Category Check
- Politics Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- History Advanced Articles
- History Nonstub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Politics Advanced Articles
- Politics Nonstub Articles
- Politics Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- History Developed Articles
- Politics Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- History Developing Articles
- Politics Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- History Stub Articles
- Politics Stub Articles
- External Articles
- History External Articles
- Politics External Articles
- History Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Politics Underlinked Articles
- History Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Politics Cleanup
- Cleanup