Talk:Slavery: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Richard Jensen
(past tense is ok)
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details))
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{subpages}}
|                abc = Slavery
|                cat1 = Sociology
|                cat2 = History
|                cat3 = Anthropology
|          cat_check = N
|              status = 2
|        underlinked = Y
|            cleanup = Y
|                  by = [[User:Richard J. Senghas|Richard J. Senghas]] 17:07, 1 June 2007 (CDT)
}}


== Implied past tense of slavery as a phenomenon ==
== Implied past tense of slavery as a phenomenon ==

Revision as of 16:38, 14 November 2007

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition A social system in which people have legal rights of property ownership over others. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Sociology, History and Anthropology [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Implied past tense of slavery as a phenomenon

No doubt it's unintentional, but the language of this article seems to reinforce subtly the idea that slavery is primarily a phenomenon of the past, rather than something that is occurring in various forms even in the present, and even in many countries where it has been formally banned (including the USA). This could (should?) be mentioned even in the very introduction of the article, and might even create a little spark to encourage further reading.

So glad to see this article appearing. This is a serious topic, and deserves attention. Thanks for getting it going!

Richard J. Senghas 17:17, 1 June 2007 (CDT)

I think the past tense is appropriate. Richard Jensen 17:36, 1 June 2007 (CDT)