Talk:Mr. Calder and Mr. Behrens: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>David Hoffman
No edit summary
imported>D. Matt Innis
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:


:Sorry, Hayford, I can see that it would be better go elsewhere to debate the (un)professional tone of that template. BTW I confirmed that you did write 100% of the WP stub. Best wishes. [[User:David Hoffman|David Hoffman]] 13:44, 16 May 2007 (CDT)
:Sorry, Hayford, I can see that it would be better go elsewhere to debate the (un)professional tone of that template. BTW I confirmed that you did write 100% of the WP stub. Best wishes. [[User:David Hoffman|David Hoffman]] 13:44, 16 May 2007 (CDT)
::Don't be sorry, I agree, that template crossed some line, that's why I took it off ;-) --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 13:55, 16 May 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 12:55, 16 May 2007


Article Checklist for "Mr. Calder and Mr. Behrens"
Workgroup category or categories Literature Workgroup [Please add or review categories]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Hayford Peirce 12:43, 16 May 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





I wrote 100% of this article at Wikipedia. I intend to expand it greatly later today. Hayford Peirce 12:39, 16 May 2007 (CDT)

The opening template may seem rather odd to visitors. Hopefully, visitors come to read about Calder and Behrens, the nuances of licensing and the relationship with Wikipedia is probably not on their minds. This just sounds like CZ has one big chip on its shoulder. In my opinion. David Hoffman 12:05, 16 May 2007 (CDT)

Hi David and Hayford, you are correct Hayford in that "If" you wrote this at wikipedia (it shouldn't be hard to find out) or changed it significantly once here, just make a note of it on top of the tall page here and everything should be fine. We try not to put any templates on the article pages themselves or even the talk pages for that matter. The thing to do now is get CZ:The Article Checklist started at the top of this page ASAP and get your categories assigned. Then you should be safe unti you get an opportunity to grow the article. --Matt Innis (Talk) 12:23, 16 May 2007 (CDT)

Sorry, Hayford, I can see that it would be better go elsewhere to debate the (un)professional tone of that template. BTW I confirmed that you did write 100% of the WP stub. Best wishes. David Hoffman 13:44, 16 May 2007 (CDT)
Don't be sorry, I agree, that template crossed some line, that's why I took it off ;-) --Matt Innis (Talk) 13:55, 16 May 2007 (CDT)