Talk:Intelligent design movement: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Gareth Leng
No edit summary
imported>Yi Zhe Wu
(National Review article)
Line 28: Line 28:


I've moved some criticism from ID here, as it seemed more directed at the proponents than at the theory.[[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 08:53, 22 May 2007 (CDT)
I've moved some criticism from ID here, as it seemed more directed at the proponents than at the theory.[[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 08:53, 22 May 2007 (CDT)
== National Review article ==
[http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/akyol200512020813.asp This article in National Review] probably can serve as a good source to understand the movement. [[User:Yi Zhe Wu|Yi Zhe Wu]] 15:51, 26 May 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 14:51, 26 May 2007


Article Checklist for "Intelligent design movement"
Workgroup category or categories Biology Workgroup, Philosophy Workgroup, Religion Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Matt Innis (Talk) 19:37, 17 May 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





In brief:

abc means the form of the title for alphabetization, e.g. "Doherty, John". cat1, cat2 and cat3 are categories; if there is only one category, put it in cat1. cat_check: put "yes" if you want someone to check over the categories status: 0 for approved articles; 1 developed, 2 developing, 3 stub, 4 external underlinked: put "yes" if not enough other articles link to it (click "What links here" at left) cleanup: put "yes" if basic cleanup has been done. by: Names of anyone editing the checklist, in reverse chronological order. Retrieved from "http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Template:Checklist"

Again, where does this initial quotation come from? --Larry Sanger 08:39, 17 May 2007 (CDT)


I have no idea. Will Nesbitt 10:59, 17 May 2007 (CDT)

I've moved some criticism from ID here, as it seemed more directed at the proponents than at the theory.Gareth Leng 08:53, 22 May 2007 (CDT)

National Review article

This article in National Review probably can serve as a good source to understand the movement. Yi Zhe Wu 15:51, 26 May 2007 (CDT)